08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7C<br />

The Aesthetics and Affects of Cuteness (Chair, Bieke Zaman)<br />

Further <strong>in</strong>formation on the project: http://cuteness-studies.org/<br />

Joshua Paul Dale<br />

Agency and the Appeal of the Cute Object: From “Gloomy Bear” to Tame Siberian Foxes<br />

The aesthetic of cuteness, and the affect that <strong>in</strong>forms it, are a ris<strong>in</strong>g trend <strong>in</strong> global popular culture.<br />

However, the derivation of “cute” from “acute” <strong>in</strong> English has caused some scholars to mistakenly place<br />

negative qualities such as aggression, violence and sadism at the heart of this aesthetic. Oppos<strong>in</strong>g this view, I<br />

analyze the character “Gloomy Bear” (a large, p<strong>in</strong>k, violent bear) to show that the subject discharges<br />

aggressive impulses aga<strong>in</strong>st itself <strong>in</strong> order to protect a vulnerable cute object. In the study of cute affect, a<br />

new hypothesis proposes social engagement as the primary motivation beh<strong>in</strong>d the cuteness response. This<br />

alternative organiz<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciple allows for a new theory of agency on the part of the cute object, which I<br />

develop through the case study of a newly domesticated animal: Siberian silver foxes. By explor<strong>in</strong>g these<br />

foxes’ transition from wild animal to tame pet, I offer an expanded palette of characteristics for use <strong>in</strong><br />

analyz<strong>in</strong>g cute objects. Expressions of cuteness, whether they emanate from animals, objects, or people,<br />

comprise a form of agency: namely, an appeal aimed at disarm<strong>in</strong>g aggression and promot<strong>in</strong>g sociality.<br />

Cesar Albarran-Torres<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Kittens, Farms and Wild Pandas: The Aesthetic Paradox of Childlike Cuteness <strong>in</strong> slot<br />

This paper discusses the role of cuteness <strong>in</strong> the design of what I call gamble-play media, a category that<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes terrestrial and onl<strong>in</strong>e slots. In gamble-play media the fun aspects of gambl<strong>in</strong>g are privileged over<br />

w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g or los<strong>in</strong>g, and cuteness is often a key element <strong>in</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g this enjoyment. This shift <strong>in</strong> focus<br />

establishes new dynamics of seduction and control for a media format <strong>in</strong> which gambl<strong>in</strong>g practices are<br />

staged <strong>in</strong> ways that resemble other <strong>in</strong>teractive technologies such as video games. In cute slots, imagery that<br />

we might ord<strong>in</strong>arily associate with children, along with the symbolic dichotomy of care/dom<strong>in</strong>ation that the<br />

gambler establishes with animal characters featured on and <strong>in</strong> these devices, is an essential part of the<br />

amusement, as is the sociality that may be released by cuteness. Through a close analysis of the cute slots<br />

OMG Kittens!, Wild Panda and Crazy Farm Race, this paper argues that childlike cuteness is deployed as a<br />

rhetorical tool that foregrounds gambl<strong>in</strong>g’s playfulness. Cuteness m<strong>in</strong>imalizes gambl<strong>in</strong>g’s many dangers <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of problematic consumption and the target<strong>in</strong>g of vulnerable populations, some of which might be<br />

particularly drawn to images of cute, cuddly animals.<br />

Maria Pramaggiore<br />

Dangerous Cute: American Military Men, YouTube Videos, and the War on Terror<br />

This project exam<strong>in</strong>es the dynamics of American mascul<strong>in</strong>ity as exemplified <strong>in</strong> YouTube videos made by US<br />

troops prosecut<strong>in</strong>g the War on Terror. In these post-9/11 remix record<strong>in</strong>gs, military personnel re-stage music<br />

videos by Lady Gaga, Beyoncé, Carly Rae Jepsen and others. Orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the combat theatres of Iraq and<br />

Afghanistan, they have been dissem<strong>in</strong>ated to millions of viewers around the world. These cute videos<br />

conform to the conventions of the viral music video while also encod<strong>in</strong>g the precarity of soldier<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

21st century. Moreover, they serve a strategic purpose that resonates with propaganda for the War on<br />

Terror, whose justification <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly centers on a starkly drawn gender dualism pitt<strong>in</strong>g a secular,<br />

egalitarian West aga<strong>in</strong>st a backward-fac<strong>in</strong>g Islam whose oppressed women are <strong>in</strong> need of rescue. This paper<br />

argues that these cute, complex, and contradictory performances embody both authority cuteness (as<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed by Brian McVeigh) and sovereign mascul<strong>in</strong>ity (as conceived of by fem<strong>in</strong>ist philosopher Bonnie<br />

Mann).<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!