Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
as a belong<strong>in</strong>g to a specific scientific world def<strong>in</strong>es a researcher. Concepts, methods, attitudes, and theories<br />
have to, at least to some extent, be redef<strong>in</strong>ed based upon new common agreements. Such a process<br />
demands researchers to occasionally leave their own “truths” and be open and curios <strong>in</strong> the common world.<br />
3M<br />
New Media Gatekeepers: Ecosystems of Access and Denial (Chair, Jack Bratich)<br />
Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Crisp<br />
Pirate Gatekeepers: Distribution Practices with<strong>in</strong> Film Fileshar<strong>in</strong>g Forums<br />
This paper considers what role ‘pirates’ have to play with<strong>in</strong> film distribution and to what extent they<br />
re<strong>in</strong>force or destabilize the exist<strong>in</strong>g power dynamics of the cultural <strong>in</strong>dustries? Indeed, piracy is often said to<br />
threaten the very existence of the film <strong>in</strong>dustry by giv<strong>in</strong>g audiences free access (albeit illegally) to a limitless<br />
smorgasbord of media content. Indeed, for the technically literate, who can afford the equipment, know<br />
where to go, and know what they are look<strong>in</strong>g for, rare films have never been more accessible. However, this<br />
paper will suggest that <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> contexts film piracy is <strong>in</strong> fact tightly controlled by onl<strong>in</strong>e gatekeepers who<br />
are <strong>in</strong> turn subtly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the official film <strong>in</strong>dustry. By look<strong>in</strong>g at two fileshar<strong>in</strong>g communities that<br />
specialize <strong>in</strong> East Asian c<strong>in</strong>ema, this paper will exam<strong>in</strong>e how formal film distribution companies are able to<br />
exert considerable <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> the most unlikely of contexts: onl<strong>in</strong>e pirate networks.<br />
Janneke Adema Revisit<strong>in</strong>g the Book Review<br />
This paper explores gatekeep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> academic publish<strong>in</strong>g by look<strong>in</strong>g at post-publication review<strong>in</strong>g practices. It<br />
specifically explores the book review: how has it developed as a publication form and how does it currently<br />
function as a filter<strong>in</strong>g device? It critically exam<strong>in</strong>es the mechanisms beh<strong>in</strong>d book review<strong>in</strong>g’s select<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
sort<strong>in</strong>g of academic research, how it shapes what counts as research, and how there is a lack of transparency<br />
with respect to how selection takes place. Follow<strong>in</strong>g current research on algorithmic culture (Striphas 2015,<br />
Gillespie 20<strong>14</strong>) this paper will argue that many of the new algorithm-based post-publication review practices<br />
(from Amazon’s recommendations to Twitter retweets), albeit perceived as more objective, cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />
thwart our ability to <strong>in</strong>terrogate their underly<strong>in</strong>g decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms. To reth<strong>in</strong>k the book review<br />
and with that scholarship <strong>in</strong> a digital context, this paper will exam<strong>in</strong>e potential post-publication review<br />
alternatives and <strong>in</strong> the process will suggest different ways to perceive research-<strong>in</strong>-progress.<br />
Margie Borschke<br />
Of Distribution<br />
Gatekeepers and Gatecrashers: What The V<strong>in</strong>yl Revival Can Teach Us About The Aesthetics<br />
This talk will consider the advantages and disadvantages to employ<strong>in</strong>g the metaphor of gatekeep<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
consider questions of filter<strong>in</strong>g, access and denial <strong>in</strong> our era of digital networks. I will argue that gatekeep<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is a primarily a question of distribution rather than production and show how we can learn more about these<br />
practices if we consider the aesthetic dimensions of distribution practices and the materiality of media.<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g on my recent research on media use <strong>in</strong> popular music culture, I will consider the much-celebrated<br />
revival of v<strong>in</strong>yl records to consider how users employ analog media technologies to work with the biases and<br />
affordances of digital network technologies.<br />
92