Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
pharmaceutical commodity above provid<strong>in</strong>g proper patient education. The concept of pharmaceutical<br />
fetishism relies upon the forms of pseudo-autonomy presented to consumers, namely through direct-toconsumer<br />
(DTC) advertisements.<br />
Stephen Tomsen* & Kev Dertardian<br />
Violence, identity and marg<strong>in</strong>al mascul<strong>in</strong>ities <strong>in</strong> urban drug/substance use<br />
Men who <strong>in</strong>ject illicit drugs are almost universally viewed as a serious social threat with significant potential<br />
for violence and crim<strong>in</strong>al activity. This presentation reports on the results of semi-structured <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />
focused on life experience and mean<strong>in</strong>gs of violence among 20 male <strong>in</strong>ject<strong>in</strong>g drug users present<strong>in</strong>g at the<br />
Sydney K<strong>in</strong>gs Cross Metropolitan Safe Inject<strong>in</strong>g Centre (MSIC) <strong>in</strong> early <strong>2016</strong>. Interviewees exhibited identities<br />
that were shift<strong>in</strong>g, vulnerable and at frequent risk of victimisation without be<strong>in</strong>g drawn to violence and<br />
crim<strong>in</strong>al activity as a straightforward assertion of dom<strong>in</strong>ant mascul<strong>in</strong>ity. Furthermore, these marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />
“client” mascul<strong>in</strong>e identities are partly drawn from construction of the MSIC as an abject space of drug<br />
consumption that contrasts with a ma<strong>in</strong>stream reconfiguration and new legitimacy of Sydney’s urban male<br />
leisure consumption <strong>in</strong> locations of extended high profit and taxable hedonistic dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and gambl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
10L<br />
Educational spaces, race and postcolonialism (Chair, Remy Low)<br />
Lara Palombo* & Ela<strong>in</strong>e Laforteza*<br />
academic<br />
Are universities “white” spaces? Race, whiteness and the non-white<br />
In this paper, we track how Australian universities can operate as “white” <strong>in</strong>stitutions that def<strong>in</strong>e rules and<br />
techniques of pedagogy that imag<strong>in</strong>e the “acceptable academic” as well as mediate staff <strong>in</strong>teractions with<br />
students and other staff. We contend with issues that bear upon our experiences as long term casuals and<br />
short term contract workers that are also committed to critical race studies <strong>in</strong>side zones of contact<br />
(<strong>in</strong>)formed through whiteness. Here, we recognise that Australian universities have been and are made up of<br />
paths of privilege, non-compliance, question<strong>in</strong>g and subversion that have <strong>in</strong>terpolated our desires, as well as<br />
allowed our presence with<strong>in</strong> these <strong>in</strong>stitutions. We reflect on how the <strong>in</strong>stitutional strategies that might<br />
have brought us <strong>in</strong> this space are now compet<strong>in</strong>g to limit, if not ext<strong>in</strong>guish, our presence. So we end with the<br />
question: how does whiteness, as a form of structural privilege, shape our presence and <strong>in</strong>teractions with<strong>in</strong><br />
universities?<br />
Ryan Al-Natour Postcoloniz<strong>in</strong>g Educational Institutions<br />
For Aborig<strong>in</strong>al and Torres Strait Islander peoples, Australian universities have functioned as racialised Eurocentric<br />
spaces that have served to colonise them. Various discipl<strong>in</strong>es from anthropology to the medical<br />
sciences have marg<strong>in</strong>alised and oppressed Indigenous peoples. In recent decades, higher educational<br />
<strong>in</strong>stitutions have allowed Aborig<strong>in</strong>al and Torres Strait Islander peoples to form part of the student and staff<br />
cohort. In this context, universities have considered <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g Indigenous content and embedd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Indigenous knowledges <strong>in</strong>to their curriculum. While the Indigenous/non-Indigenous relationships with<strong>in</strong><br />
tertiary education have transformed, it is evident that a “hidden curriculum” still exists with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
epistemological foundations of universities and cont<strong>in</strong>ues to marg<strong>in</strong>alise Indigenous knowledges. I argue<br />
that conceptualiz<strong>in</strong>g Australian universities as postcoloniz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions productively enables the<br />
identification of a series of colonial relationships that are (re)produced and rema<strong>in</strong> unchallenged <strong>in</strong> higher<br />
education today.<br />
253