08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pharmaceutical commodity above provid<strong>in</strong>g proper patient education. The concept of pharmaceutical<br />

fetishism relies upon the forms of pseudo-autonomy presented to consumers, namely through direct-toconsumer<br />

(DTC) advertisements.<br />

Stephen Tomsen* & Kev Dertardian<br />

Violence, identity and marg<strong>in</strong>al mascul<strong>in</strong>ities <strong>in</strong> urban drug/substance use<br />

Men who <strong>in</strong>ject illicit drugs are almost universally viewed as a serious social threat with significant potential<br />

for violence and crim<strong>in</strong>al activity. This presentation reports on the results of semi-structured <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />

focused on life experience and mean<strong>in</strong>gs of violence among 20 male <strong>in</strong>ject<strong>in</strong>g drug users present<strong>in</strong>g at the<br />

Sydney K<strong>in</strong>gs Cross Metropolitan Safe Inject<strong>in</strong>g Centre (MSIC) <strong>in</strong> early <strong>2016</strong>. Interviewees exhibited identities<br />

that were shift<strong>in</strong>g, vulnerable and at frequent risk of victimisation without be<strong>in</strong>g drawn to violence and<br />

crim<strong>in</strong>al activity as a straightforward assertion of dom<strong>in</strong>ant mascul<strong>in</strong>ity. Furthermore, these marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />

“client” mascul<strong>in</strong>e identities are partly drawn from construction of the MSIC as an abject space of drug<br />

consumption that contrasts with a ma<strong>in</strong>stream reconfiguration and new legitimacy of Sydney’s urban male<br />

leisure consumption <strong>in</strong> locations of extended high profit and taxable hedonistic dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and gambl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

10L<br />

Educational spaces, race and postcolonialism (Chair, Remy Low)<br />

Lara Palombo* & Ela<strong>in</strong>e Laforteza*<br />

academic<br />

Are universities “white” spaces? Race, whiteness and the non-white<br />

In this paper, we track how Australian universities can operate as “white” <strong>in</strong>stitutions that def<strong>in</strong>e rules and<br />

techniques of pedagogy that imag<strong>in</strong>e the “acceptable academic” as well as mediate staff <strong>in</strong>teractions with<br />

students and other staff. We contend with issues that bear upon our experiences as long term casuals and<br />

short term contract workers that are also committed to critical race studies <strong>in</strong>side zones of contact<br />

(<strong>in</strong>)formed through whiteness. Here, we recognise that Australian universities have been and are made up of<br />

paths of privilege, non-compliance, question<strong>in</strong>g and subversion that have <strong>in</strong>terpolated our desires, as well as<br />

allowed our presence with<strong>in</strong> these <strong>in</strong>stitutions. We reflect on how the <strong>in</strong>stitutional strategies that might<br />

have brought us <strong>in</strong> this space are now compet<strong>in</strong>g to limit, if not ext<strong>in</strong>guish, our presence. So we end with the<br />

question: how does whiteness, as a form of structural privilege, shape our presence and <strong>in</strong>teractions with<strong>in</strong><br />

universities?<br />

Ryan Al-Natour Postcoloniz<strong>in</strong>g Educational Institutions<br />

For Aborig<strong>in</strong>al and Torres Strait Islander peoples, Australian universities have functioned as racialised Eurocentric<br />

spaces that have served to colonise them. Various discipl<strong>in</strong>es from anthropology to the medical<br />

sciences have marg<strong>in</strong>alised and oppressed Indigenous peoples. In recent decades, higher educational<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions have allowed Aborig<strong>in</strong>al and Torres Strait Islander peoples to form part of the student and staff<br />

cohort. In this context, universities have considered <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g Indigenous content and embedd<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Indigenous knowledges <strong>in</strong>to their curriculum. While the Indigenous/non-Indigenous relationships with<strong>in</strong><br />

tertiary education have transformed, it is evident that a “hidden curriculum” still exists with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

epistemological foundations of universities and cont<strong>in</strong>ues to marg<strong>in</strong>alise Indigenous knowledges. I argue<br />

that conceptualiz<strong>in</strong>g Australian universities as postcoloniz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions productively enables the<br />

identification of a series of colonial relationships that are (re)produced and rema<strong>in</strong> unchallenged <strong>in</strong> higher<br />

education today.<br />

253

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!