08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9B<br />

Place, Text, Materiality (Chair, Katr<strong>in</strong>a Schlunke)<br />

Kirsten Seale & Emily Potter*<br />

Inner North<br />

Place and the Literature-assemblage: Helen Garner, Monkey Grip, Melbourne’s<br />

This paper uses Bruno Latour’s work on Actor-Network Theory to theorise a literature-assemblage that takes<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account, and can account for, complex connections between literature and place. We are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong><br />

reth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g the network of literature and place, not as someth<strong>in</strong>g where literature reproduces place as<br />

mimetic representation, but as someth<strong>in</strong>g which acknowledges that the agencies, <strong>in</strong>tensities, flows, and<br />

iterations of the literature-assemblage can produce place <strong>in</strong> a material sense. By way of a case study, we<br />

look at Helen Garner’s 1977 novel Monkey Grip and its relationship with place <strong>in</strong> Melbourne’s <strong>in</strong>nernorthern<br />

suburbs of Fitzroy and Carlton. We explore, particularly, the way <strong>in</strong> which the literature assemblage<br />

that is Helen Garner’s writ<strong>in</strong>g Monkey Grip can be understood as reflexively participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> processes of<br />

gentrification <strong>in</strong> these suburbs that, <strong>in</strong> turn, feed back <strong>in</strong>to the worldly life of the text.<br />

Jennifer Hamilton<br />

The Poetics of Stormwater Infrastructure <strong>in</strong> Inner Sydney<br />

Human relationships with wet weather – one of the more mundane albeit vex<strong>in</strong>g aspects of our<br />

contemporary earthly condition – are literally designed, built and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> wealthy cities. If one of the<br />

aims of the environmental humanities is to theorise ways of respond<strong>in</strong>g differently to the more-than-human<br />

world, then, for a variety of embodied and socio-political reasons, we need to account for the ways <strong>in</strong> which<br />

stormwater <strong>in</strong>frastructure complicates attempts to transform our relation with weather. Although<br />

stormwater dra<strong>in</strong>s are often made of steel and concrete, Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder rem<strong>in</strong>d us<br />

that <strong>in</strong>frastructure is paradoxical because it is both “eng<strong>in</strong>e and barrier for change, both customizable and<br />

rigid, both <strong>in</strong>side and outside organisational practices” (<strong>2016</strong>, 378). In order to open up a critique <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

entanglement of concrete, pipes, thunder, ra<strong>in</strong>, broken umbrellas and bodies that is a Sydney storm, I will<br />

characterise a poetics of stormwater <strong>in</strong>frastructure. By consider<strong>in</strong>g the materiality of <strong>in</strong>ner Sydney’s<br />

stormwater management systems alongside a series of creative works that represent people and harbourside<br />

dwell<strong>in</strong>gs, shops, dra<strong>in</strong>s and roads amidst non-disastrous storms.<br />

Brigid Magner Read<strong>in</strong>g Adam L<strong>in</strong>dsay Gordon’s Grave<br />

“To read is to conjure up the dead; to tour a gravesite is to read.” (Paul Westover, Necromanticism:<br />

Travell<strong>in</strong>g to Meet the Dead, 1750-1860, 2012) In her essay, “At the Henry Parkes motel”, Meaghan Morris<br />

has shown how Australian “Legends” such as Henry Parkes are used to engender “effects of place” which<br />

shape the experience of residents and visitors (Morris 1988). This paper explores the practices associated<br />

with the grave of literary “Legend” Adam L<strong>in</strong>dsay Gordon, contemporary of Henry Parkes, cous<strong>in</strong> of Lord<br />

Byron and the only “Australian” poet to be represented <strong>in</strong> Poet’s Corner at Westm<strong>in</strong>ster Abbey. Although<br />

Adam L<strong>in</strong>dsay Gordon is associated with a range of places <strong>in</strong> the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom and South Australia,<br />

Brighton was where he suicided <strong>in</strong> 1870, transform<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to a site of great significance for “Gordon Lovers”.<br />

The poet’s grave was the focus of the first organised Australian literary “necrotouristic” pilgrimages from<br />

1910 onwards. Today necrotourism is less popular – and Adam L<strong>in</strong>dsay Gordon’s reputation has waned —<br />

yet a read<strong>in</strong>g of his grave offers <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to the <strong>in</strong>terplay between the author’s bodily and textual rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />

and local practices of commemoration, both past and present.<br />

220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!