Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Abstract:<br />
“Civil Neoliberties”<br />
Neoliberalism as a set of <strong>in</strong>stitutions and ideas and as a mode of governance has posed a real<br />
challenge to <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Studies</strong>. On the one hand, multiculturalism as formulated by Stuart Hall and<br />
the Birm<strong>in</strong>gham school, sought a deeply committed mapp<strong>in</strong>g of counter-cultures of the marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />
and m<strong>in</strong>oritized. On the other hand, multiculturalism also anticipates the tropes of neoliberal<br />
governance as a management of diverse populations under democratic regimes. The difficulty of<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g authoritarian or majoritarian cultural formations from their m<strong>in</strong>oritarian<br />
manifestations as they travel across nation-states creates new problems for understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
emergent global political formations like “<strong>in</strong>digeneity.” In this paper I turn to the emergence of a<br />
majoritarian discourse of <strong>in</strong>digeneity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> India that not only disappears adivasi (first peoples)<br />
subjects from the Indian political landscape, but violently “counters” Dalit presence <strong>in</strong><br />
Northamerica not only through the appropriation of the language of civil rights and antidiscrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
law, but through deployment of the cultural studies critique of Orientalism and of<br />
post-colonial theory more generally. Indian immigrants thus become “native” or “<strong>in</strong>digenous” on<br />
foreign soil through adaptation of the very civil liberties discourse they decry <strong>in</strong> India for be<strong>in</strong>g “soft<br />
on m<strong>in</strong>orities.” Such paradoxes undergird what I call “Civil Neoliberties.”<br />
Rowan Wilken (Sw<strong>in</strong>burne University of Technology), Rowan Wilken is Associate Professor <strong>in</strong> media and<br />
communication with<strong>in</strong> the Sw<strong>in</strong>burne Institute for Social Research at Sw<strong>in</strong>burne University of Technology,<br />
Melbourne. His authored and co-edited books <strong>in</strong>clude Teletechnologies, Place, and Community (Routledge,<br />
2011), Mobile Technology and Place (Routledge, 2012), Locative Media (Routledge, 2015), and The<br />
Afterlives of Georges Perec (Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh University Press, 2017). He is currently work<strong>in</strong>g on two new books:<br />
<strong>Cultural</strong> Economies of Locative Media (Oxford University Press) and Location Technologies <strong>in</strong> International<br />
Context (Routledge).<br />
Abstract:<br />
“Traces of Our Passage: Location Awareness <strong>in</strong> an Age of Ubiquitous Geodata Capture”<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the advent of the smartphone, the means by which one’s physical location at particular<br />
venues is registered by end-users and by proprietors of location-enabled social media applications<br />
has shifted significantly, pass<strong>in</strong>g through a number of iterations, or generations. “First generation”<br />
location-based smartphone services required the active register<strong>in</strong>g of one”s location by end users,<br />
often <strong>in</strong> the form of “check-<strong>in</strong>s”. “Second generation” location services <strong>in</strong>volved “passive” location<br />
disclosure, track<strong>in</strong>g, and compatibility pair<strong>in</strong>g of end-users. While the “third generation” and<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant present form of location-based services <strong>in</strong>volve what I am referr<strong>in</strong>g to as ubiquitous<br />
geodata capture. These are services where location rema<strong>in</strong>s fundamental to their operation, but is<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to that service at both the front end (the <strong>in</strong>terface) and the back end (algorithmic<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g, database population, monetisation efforts, and so on). This paper beg<strong>in</strong>s by trac<strong>in</strong>g<br />
these earlier iterations, before turn<strong>in</strong>g to consider the importance of, and challenges we face, <strong>in</strong><br />
try<strong>in</strong>g to make critical sense of what is <strong>in</strong>volved – and at stake – <strong>in</strong> the move towards ubiquitous<br />
geodata capture.<br />
39