08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstract:<br />

“Civil Neoliberties”<br />

Neoliberalism as a set of <strong>in</strong>stitutions and ideas and as a mode of governance has posed a real<br />

challenge to <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Studies</strong>. On the one hand, multiculturalism as formulated by Stuart Hall and<br />

the Birm<strong>in</strong>gham school, sought a deeply committed mapp<strong>in</strong>g of counter-cultures of the marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />

and m<strong>in</strong>oritized. On the other hand, multiculturalism also anticipates the tropes of neoliberal<br />

governance as a management of diverse populations under democratic regimes. The difficulty of<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g authoritarian or majoritarian cultural formations from their m<strong>in</strong>oritarian<br />

manifestations as they travel across nation-states creates new problems for understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

emergent global political formations like “<strong>in</strong>digeneity.” In this paper I turn to the emergence of a<br />

majoritarian discourse of <strong>in</strong>digeneity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> India that not only disappears adivasi (first peoples)<br />

subjects from the Indian political landscape, but violently “counters” Dalit presence <strong>in</strong><br />

Northamerica not only through the appropriation of the language of civil rights and antidiscrim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

law, but through deployment of the cultural studies critique of Orientalism and of<br />

post-colonial theory more generally. Indian immigrants thus become “native” or “<strong>in</strong>digenous” on<br />

foreign soil through adaptation of the very civil liberties discourse they decry <strong>in</strong> India for be<strong>in</strong>g “soft<br />

on m<strong>in</strong>orities.” Such paradoxes undergird what I call “Civil Neoliberties.”<br />

Rowan Wilken (Sw<strong>in</strong>burne University of Technology), Rowan Wilken is Associate Professor <strong>in</strong> media and<br />

communication with<strong>in</strong> the Sw<strong>in</strong>burne Institute for Social Research at Sw<strong>in</strong>burne University of Technology,<br />

Melbourne. His authored and co-edited books <strong>in</strong>clude Teletechnologies, Place, and Community (Routledge,<br />

2011), Mobile Technology and Place (Routledge, 2012), Locative Media (Routledge, 2015), and The<br />

Afterlives of Georges Perec (Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh University Press, 2017). He is currently work<strong>in</strong>g on two new books:<br />

<strong>Cultural</strong> Economies of Locative Media (Oxford University Press) and Location Technologies <strong>in</strong> International<br />

Context (Routledge).<br />

Abstract:<br />

“Traces of Our Passage: Location Awareness <strong>in</strong> an Age of Ubiquitous Geodata Capture”<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the advent of the smartphone, the means by which one’s physical location at particular<br />

venues is registered by end-users and by proprietors of location-enabled social media applications<br />

has shifted significantly, pass<strong>in</strong>g through a number of iterations, or generations. “First generation”<br />

location-based smartphone services required the active register<strong>in</strong>g of one”s location by end users,<br />

often <strong>in</strong> the form of “check-<strong>in</strong>s”. “Second generation” location services <strong>in</strong>volved “passive” location<br />

disclosure, track<strong>in</strong>g, and compatibility pair<strong>in</strong>g of end-users. While the “third generation” and<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant present form of location-based services <strong>in</strong>volve what I am referr<strong>in</strong>g to as ubiquitous<br />

geodata capture. These are services where location rema<strong>in</strong>s fundamental to their operation, but is<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to that service at both the front end (the <strong>in</strong>terface) and the back end (algorithmic<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g, database population, monetisation efforts, and so on). This paper beg<strong>in</strong>s by trac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

these earlier iterations, before turn<strong>in</strong>g to consider the importance of, and challenges we face, <strong>in</strong><br />

try<strong>in</strong>g to make critical sense of what is <strong>in</strong>volved – and at stake – <strong>in</strong> the move towards ubiquitous<br />

geodata capture.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!