Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
There is an emerg<strong>in</strong>g market for what is generally termed “queer pornography”. Pornography made by<br />
queer people, for queer people. This paper will focus on the engagement between pornography and queer<br />
sexuality <strong>in</strong> contemporary pornographic genres. This <strong>in</strong>volves consider<strong>in</strong>g, for example, how concepts like<br />
“queer” are enunciated and deployed <strong>in</strong> contemporary alternative pornography, track<strong>in</strong>g how they are<br />
positioned <strong>in</strong> relation to audiences and to production. This paper will unpack how texts are sorted and<br />
sought out through their generic signifiers, and how for pornography, that means the identity categories and<br />
bodies they represent and the actions they perform. This paper will focus <strong>in</strong> on how queer pornography<br />
crucially sets up a series of promises about what a politically m<strong>in</strong>ded person can expect from the text. These<br />
promises may be about <strong>in</strong>dustry conditions. They may be about the possibility of see<strong>in</strong>g more “authentic”<br />
queer sex or sex-and gender-diverse bodies. This paper will raise questions about how genre and<br />
pornography are related, consider<strong>in</strong>g the problems of classification and reception <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> relations<br />
between visible bodies and embodied identities.<br />
Jordan McArthur<br />
P<strong>in</strong>kwash<strong>in</strong>g – or, the Cunn<strong>in</strong>g of Corporate Recognition<br />
Debates about the corporatisation and privatisation of LGBTQ community events have become a significant<br />
problem for queer politics <strong>in</strong> Australia and New Zealand. To secure fund<strong>in</strong>g as well as support for (neoliberal)<br />
rights, LGBTQ organisations align themselves with national and mult<strong>in</strong>ational corporations. In turn,<br />
corporations get to promote themselves as diverse and <strong>in</strong>clusive, chang<strong>in</strong>g their corporate culture, as well as<br />
giv<strong>in</strong>g them access to queer cultural markets. For activists and some commentators, this is perceived as<br />
“p<strong>in</strong>kwash<strong>in</strong>g,” whereby these corporations support LGBTQ organisations <strong>in</strong> order to hide nefarious bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
practices. Us<strong>in</strong>g a conceptual frame developed from anthropology and cultural studies, I argue that this<br />
process is the cunn<strong>in</strong>g of corporate recognition, <strong>in</strong> which social recognition for LGBTQ organisations means<br />
<strong>in</strong>commensurate queer worlds and subjectivities become displaced, excluded, and un<strong>in</strong>telligible. This is of<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest to popular culture as these corporations often brand and sponsor queer cultural worlds, preclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
other forms of queer alterities, futurities, and potentialities to create social and cultural change.<br />
10P<br />
Emergent Political Collectives: Publics, Commons and the Demos (Chair, TBA)<br />
In this session we explore efforts to re-<strong>in</strong>vigorate politics around the management of public resources and the care<br />
of commonwealth. What’s at stake <strong>in</strong> this new politics is the disposition of th<strong>in</strong>gs and relationships vital to life – the<br />
provision<strong>in</strong>g of water, hous<strong>in</strong>g, energy, and caregiv<strong>in</strong>g are illustrative examples of where a new politics, both public<br />
and common, is emerg<strong>in</strong>g. Wendy Brown <strong>in</strong> Undo<strong>in</strong>g the Demos (2015) traces how economic rationalization has<br />
become a dom<strong>in</strong>ant logic of social organization displac<strong>in</strong>g, over time, all other ways of th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and speak<strong>in</strong>g about<br />
social life – <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g core concepts that <strong>in</strong>form democratic theory and practice. Economic rationalization, as it<br />
proceeds, makes it progressively more difficult to imag<strong>in</strong>e ourselves either as members of a public – a community of<br />
strangers fac<strong>in</strong>g shared challenges – or as custodians of a commonwealth – those spaces, relationships and<br />
resources that we use and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> without own<strong>in</strong>g through time (Bollier, Th<strong>in</strong>k Like a Commoner, 20<strong>14</strong>). The<br />
start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t of this session is that this process of economization is <strong>in</strong>complete and often contested. The wellestablished<br />
nomenclature of neoliberalism covers over diffuse and <strong>in</strong>ventive efforts at re-municipalization of<br />
resources, the use and care of common resources, and efforts at redef<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g civic life through new modes of mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
th<strong>in</strong>gs public and new experiences of be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> common.<br />
Gay Hawk<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Hybrid Assemblages: Water Markets and Publics<br />
This paper <strong>in</strong>vestigates the impacts of bottled water markets on Sydney Water – a corporatized but publicly<br />
owned authority provid<strong>in</strong>g universal access to water and sanitation. Rather than frame this analysis <strong>in</strong> terms<br />
257