08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

studies, even <strong>in</strong> those articulations of media archaeology that seem most skeptical of cultural studies<br />

approaches. F<strong>in</strong>ally it will suggest that the media archaeological concept of cultural techniques provides a<br />

possible space of encounter between the two fields <strong>in</strong> the realm of technically mediated cultural practices.<br />

Ti Wei Neo-liberalism or old? A rediscovery of “media disorder” <strong>in</strong> Taiwan <strong>in</strong> the liberalization era s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1980s<br />

The media <strong>in</strong> Taiwan has been widely and severely criticized for more than twenty years. The problem<br />

started from the second half of the 1980s <strong>in</strong> the background of the lift of martial law as well as of the state<br />

control on the media. The “freer” press, particularly the newly released 24-hour cable TV news channels<br />

around the 1990s, provided evidently low-quality news and talk shows (Lee, 2009), and the media had been<br />

regarded as one of the reasons of social disorder <strong>in</strong> general at the time. Around the late 1990s, the term<br />

“media disorder” has been created and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly and widely used and referred to the related<br />

phenomena. However, the term has lacked clear def<strong>in</strong>ition both <strong>in</strong> the society and <strong>in</strong> academia. The<br />

confus<strong>in</strong>g usage of it <strong>in</strong> the past fifteen years obscured the real central problem of Taiwanese media. On the<br />

other hand, many commentators and researchers argue that the disorder of the media was ma<strong>in</strong>ly a<br />

consequence of Neo-liberalism, which has been implemented and promoted as a ma<strong>in</strong> economic policy and<br />

political ideology firstly <strong>in</strong> the West s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1980s and around the world thereafter. They stress that<br />

Taiwanese government adopted Neo-liberalist policies such as complete deregulation of the ownership<br />

restrictions on broadcast<strong>in</strong>g and cable TV service and privatized formerly state-party owned TV stations (e.g.<br />

Lo, 2006). However, the simple application of the explanatory framework of Neo-liberalism onto Taiwan<br />

society does have some bl<strong>in</strong>d spots that may h<strong>in</strong>der our understand<strong>in</strong>g of the transformation of Taiwan’s<br />

media. This paper considers the so-called “media disorder” <strong>in</strong> Taiwan by re-exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1) key scholar and<br />

media critic’s works (e.g. L<strong>in</strong>, 2006; Foundation for Excellent Journalism Award, 2008), and 2) news reports<br />

and articles mention<strong>in</strong>g “media disorder” <strong>in</strong> representative ma<strong>in</strong>stream media. The result can also<br />

contribute to an alternative explanatory framework dist<strong>in</strong>ctive from Western societies. One of the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

consequences of the neoliberal critique is that the role of “market” is simply regarded as an evil existence.<br />

The paper concludes that so-called “media disorder” is too ambiguous and the critic of Neo-liberalism is delocalized<br />

to grasp the real problem of Taiwanese media.<br />

6W<br />

Visual culture and <strong>in</strong>tercultural relations (Chair, Timothy Kazuo Stea<strong>in</strong>s)<br />

M. Ragıp Zık Digitality and Everyday Life: affective <strong>in</strong>teractions across Greece and Turkey through visual images<br />

With<strong>in</strong> less than a decade, we witnessed how digital technologies could help public dissent establish new<br />

forms of communication, <strong>in</strong>teraction and solidarity, while go<strong>in</strong>g beyond the pre-def<strong>in</strong>ed national, temporal<br />

and l<strong>in</strong>gual borders. Although technology has been part of protest actions ever s<strong>in</strong>ce, this new era of<br />

digitality offers new platforms and tools that lead to fluid and omnipresent <strong>in</strong>teraction among the<br />

participants of different social movements. Quick and ephemeral contacts between people help transfer the<br />

emotional climate across protests, creat<strong>in</strong>g affective and transnational bonds between movements tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

part <strong>in</strong> separate countries. With the affective turn <strong>in</strong> social sciences and the contribution of cultural studies<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g everyday life theories, visual image shar<strong>in</strong>g through digital platforms offer an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g medium<br />

for contemporary social movement research. Often supported by textual <strong>in</strong>put, visual images help carry the<br />

“feel<strong>in</strong>g of the moment” from one context to another, and <strong>in</strong> some cases it was even adopted and localized.<br />

We have seen examples of circulation and adoption of slogans and symbols across movements such as Arab<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>g, Occupy, and Indignados. Visual images on the other hand, have the potential to saturate everyday<br />

life of social movements with digital platforms by circulat<strong>in</strong>g affect. The current <strong>in</strong>teraction between Turkey<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!