08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6H<br />

Towards Thick Data: Stories from the Field (Chair, Liam Magee)<br />

Heather Ford*, Walid Al-Saqaf, Tanja Bosch & Lone Sorensen<br />

Geertz’s Map<br />

We chart the histories of the term “thick data” (Wang 20<strong>14</strong>) to its roots <strong>in</strong> Geertz”s (1973) writ<strong>in</strong>g on “thick<br />

description”, outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the practical implications for Geertz”s theory of culture to the study of onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

behavior. Geertz writes that “culture is not a power, someth<strong>in</strong>g to which social events, behaviors,<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions, or processes can be causally attributed; it is a context, someth<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> which they can be<br />

<strong>in</strong>telligibly – that is, thickly – described”. While the majority of tools or <strong>in</strong>struments for study<strong>in</strong>g “big” social<br />

media data enable us to observe patterns of behavior, we need theoretical frameworks to <strong>in</strong>terpret that<br />

behavior. Theory makes thick description possible, writes Geertz, not by the analyst generaliz<strong>in</strong>g across cases<br />

but by generaliz<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> them. We applied this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple to the study of political conflict and the case of<br />

Twitter discussions of the 2015/6 South African State of the Nation Address. Bespoke quantitative tools<br />

provided an observational lens, and fram<strong>in</strong>g theory (Entman 1993) enabled us to develop qualitative<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretations. This two-step approach is necessary to move towards <strong>in</strong>terpretations of behavior <strong>in</strong> context<br />

and, while quantitative tools that enable observation are clearly important, <strong>in</strong>terpretation requires the use<br />

of relevant theory.<br />

Luigi Di Mart<strong>in</strong>o Qualitative analysis with<strong>in</strong> computational Twitter Analysis<br />

Large social media datasets paradoxically are both qualitative and quantitative, s<strong>in</strong>ce they conta<strong>in</strong><br />

quantifiable <strong>in</strong>formation, such as number of followers, retweets, mentions, but also texts and images that<br />

require a qualitative approach. However, the support of mach<strong>in</strong>es is unavoidable for the analysis of large<br />

datasets, due to the huge amount of <strong>in</strong>formation that would otherwise require a long time to be manually<br />

processed and classified. Indeed, digital maps enable one to zoom <strong>in</strong> and out <strong>in</strong> order to observe data at<br />

different scales, computational analysis of social media data offers multiple lenses for analys<strong>in</strong>g patterns <strong>in</strong><br />

behaviour. Beyond metrics and network visualisations, analys<strong>in</strong>g images and memes qualitatively accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the author’s tone and triangulat<strong>in</strong>g observational f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs to avoid mislead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpretation of data<br />

enable further analysis. By analys<strong>in</strong>g the Twitter data collected dur<strong>in</strong>g the G20-20<strong>14</strong> <strong>in</strong> Brisbane, this paper<br />

will illustrate a mixed methodological approach for the study of Public Diplomacy on Twitter. It will suggest<br />

the necessity of comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g both quantitative and qualitative methodological strategies to comprehend<br />

context and cross-platform flow of <strong>in</strong>formation. Draw<strong>in</strong>g on research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, we offer two accounts of data<br />

as it emerged from our project: as th<strong>in</strong> data where prevalence is given to digital content, data visualisations<br />

and the media “message”; and thick data where the politics of the digital are enmeshed <strong>in</strong> socio-cultural<br />

mediations and conceptions. This is not a dichotomy, but a complex <strong>in</strong>terweav<strong>in</strong>g of practice and perception<br />

that is gendered, “unthought” and reflexive; <strong>in</strong>dividual and <strong>in</strong>stitutional: part of the complexity and<br />

embeddedness of data <strong>in</strong> our everyday. It is this that needs critical attention if we are to understand the<br />

politics of data and its” impact across cultures, subcultures and <strong>in</strong>stitutions for the future.<br />

Helen Thornham* & Sarah Maltby<br />

Thick data and the military<br />

Data, big data and datalogical systems are already “an established presence <strong>in</strong> our everyday cultural lives”<br />

(Beer, 2015:2) and this means that the material and embodied configurations of data are both normative<br />

and novel. For the MoD (British M<strong>in</strong>istry of Defence, stakeholder of our ESRC research project), big data and<br />

social media go hand <strong>in</strong> hand – generat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>credible opportunity and risk that feed <strong>in</strong>to a grow<strong>in</strong>g schism<br />

between how organisations use and constitute data on the one hand, and how data is generated and<br />

conceptualised through everyday digital mediations on the other. Draw<strong>in</strong>g on research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, we offer<br />

two accounts of data as it emerged from our project: as th<strong>in</strong> data where prevalence is given to digital<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!