08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The fem<strong>in</strong>ist philosopher Alison Bailey noted, <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>formal review of Fem<strong>in</strong>ist Interpretations of Mary Daly<br />

posted on Amazon <strong>in</strong> 2001, that she had never read Mary Daly closely “because the word on the academic<br />

streets was that she had noth<strong>in</strong>g serious to offer”. By the 1990s Daly’s works were derided as excessively<br />

theological, utopian and essentialist. She was now radical <strong>in</strong> the wrong ways, <strong>in</strong> contrast to the antiessentialist<br />

focus on performativity and desire that characterised much fem<strong>in</strong>ist thought of that subsequent<br />

era. Daly was much more <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> women, than she was <strong>in</strong> gender. This paper calls for a re-reckon<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with the oeuvre of Mary Daly, performed through a read<strong>in</strong>g of her <strong>in</strong>troductions to each re-issue of her first<br />

major work, The Church and the Second Sex. First published <strong>in</strong> 1968, it was repr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> 1975 and 1985.<br />

Daly’s <strong>in</strong>troductions to each repr<strong>in</strong>t narrate her movement away from the author she was <strong>in</strong> the previous<br />

iteration, offer<strong>in</strong>g stories of <strong>in</strong>tellectual and spiritual transformation <strong>in</strong> which the personal is political is<br />

theological is philosophical. As she narrates herself <strong>in</strong>tellectually, she embraces the manifesto as her form. In<br />

her tell<strong>in</strong>g, writ<strong>in</strong>g becomes the vehicle for <strong>in</strong>junction, rather than commentary. This paper will map Daly’s<br />

story onto the larger history of radical fem<strong>in</strong>ism, explor<strong>in</strong>g the work performed by the logic of the manifesto<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the movement.<br />

Amanda Third Recuperat<strong>in</strong>g the Fem<strong>in</strong>ist Manifesto: Read<strong>in</strong>g the Female Terrorist’s Autobiography<br />

The 1974 publication of Jane Alpert’s fem<strong>in</strong>ist manifesto, “Mother Right”, is cited as a key marker of the shift<br />

from radical to cultural fem<strong>in</strong>ism <strong>in</strong> the US <strong>in</strong> the mid-1970s. Written underground, while she was on the run<br />

due to her participation <strong>in</strong> left-w<strong>in</strong>g urban terrorism <strong>in</strong> the late 1960s/early 1970s, the manifesto was<br />

published and promoted by her close friend and fem<strong>in</strong>ist ally, Rob<strong>in</strong> Morgan. Seven years later, after time <strong>in</strong><br />

prison, Alpert published an autobiography – Grow<strong>in</strong>g Up Underground – centr<strong>in</strong>g on her time with the<br />

Jackson-Melville terrorist cell. This paper analyses how both Alpert’s manifesto and autobiography operate<br />

as mechanisms for the female terrorist’s “re<strong>in</strong>tegration” <strong>in</strong>to ma<strong>in</strong>stream society. Resonat<strong>in</strong>g as exculpatory<br />

narratives, Alpert’s texts are notable for the ways they grapple with the <strong>in</strong>stitution of the family. Draw<strong>in</strong>g<br />

upon the antipsychiatry literature, and read<strong>in</strong>g the texts through the lens of Michel Foucault’s work on<br />

confession, I explore how such confessional narratives articulate with dom<strong>in</strong>ant cultural logics of gender to<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>, recuperate and exonerate the female terrorist. In do<strong>in</strong>g so, I reflect upon the limits of the gender<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the political.<br />

Natalya Lusty<br />

Riot Grrrl Manifestos and Radical Vernacular Fem<strong>in</strong>ism<br />

This paper exam<strong>in</strong>es riot grrrl manifestos <strong>in</strong> the context of the emergence of a vernacular third wave<br />

fem<strong>in</strong>ism <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s. Although riot grrrl manifestos draw on aspects of second wave radical fem<strong>in</strong>ism<br />

and older forms of avant-garde culture, they push the genre of the manifesto <strong>in</strong>to new territory by stress<strong>in</strong>g<br />

everyday forms of resistance, def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g their imag<strong>in</strong>ed consistency as porous and reactive rather than<br />

exclusive or determ<strong>in</strong>ed. It exam<strong>in</strong>es how early Riot Grrrl manifestos rejected the traditional claims and<br />

modus operandi of the radical public sphere by <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g on a vernacular fem<strong>in</strong>ism def<strong>in</strong>ed through the<br />

rhetorical figure of the girl and non-normative fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e behaviour to emphasize everyday, micropolitical<br />

action over grand narratives of resistance and revolution. By re<strong>in</strong>scrib<strong>in</strong>g the very terms of radicalism to<br />

critique both ma<strong>in</strong>stream and alternative cultural doma<strong>in</strong>s these manifestos have much to teach us about<br />

the endur<strong>in</strong>g forms of radical fem<strong>in</strong>ism.<br />

1Q<br />

Visibility, Invisibility, and Disappearance <strong>in</strong> Social Media and Digital Culture (Chair, Grant Bollmer)<br />

Explor<strong>in</strong>g the visual culture of digital and social media, this panel exam<strong>in</strong>es the politics of trauma, representation,<br />

and vision through discussions of selfies, smartphone photography, and onl<strong>in</strong>e subjectivity.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!