08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of state versus market or the neoliberal corporatisation of everyth<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>vestigates how public<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructures function as <strong>in</strong>terfaces where dist<strong>in</strong>ctions between consumers and publics are cont<strong>in</strong>ually<br />

negotiated. S<strong>in</strong>ce corporatisation Sydney Water has addressed its users as customers and framed water use<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>dividual choices. At the same time it has also developed campaigns promot<strong>in</strong>g water and the<br />

catchment as a shared public resource fundamental to the common good. The rapid rise of bottled water<br />

markets has <strong>in</strong>tensified this hybridisation of bus<strong>in</strong>ess and political lexicons highlight<strong>in</strong>g the ways <strong>in</strong> which<br />

shift<strong>in</strong>g boundaries between consumers and publics, <strong>in</strong>dividualised and shared are materialised through<br />

mundane devices from plastic bottles to domestic taps to public water founta<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Louise Crabtree Hous<strong>in</strong>g as commons: did we miss someth<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

This paper will discuss the issues raised by approach<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g as commons. Historically, “commons” as a<br />

Western context has referred to spaces and systems of subsistence activities such as collectively managed<br />

graz<strong>in</strong>g lands or fisheries. More recently, this has expanded to <strong>in</strong>clude water supplies, the atmosphere, and<br />

new terra<strong>in</strong>s such as onl<strong>in</strong>e systems and/or content amongst others. Human dwell<strong>in</strong>gs rema<strong>in</strong> conspicuously<br />

absent from such considerations: the majority of commons literature and examples <strong>in</strong> the West elide how it<br />

is that humans reside <strong>in</strong> space, imply<strong>in</strong>g that common<strong>in</strong>g can happen regardless of the destabilisation of<br />

dwell<strong>in</strong>g due to seem<strong>in</strong>gly ever-<strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g market pressure. Given that, ironically, the enclosures<br />

are perhaps most evident <strong>in</strong> the ongo<strong>in</strong>g expansion of debt-based, speculative hous<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>deed are<br />

fundamental to such a system, and given the global f<strong>in</strong>ancial vulnerability this creates, it seems timely to<br />

explore the implications of hous<strong>in</strong>g as a commons.<br />

Stephen Healy Care and Common Concern<br />

One manifestation of the care crisis is elevated stress levels among nurs<strong>in</strong>g staff. Staff<strong>in</strong>g rationalization is<br />

one obvious explanation for stress though caregivers themselves identify <strong>in</strong>creased report<strong>in</strong>g requirements<br />

as someth<strong>in</strong>g that competes for the time and emotional energy effective care requires. What this suggests is<br />

that it’s not the work, it’s not be<strong>in</strong>g able to do the job well that is stressful. Follow<strong>in</strong>g David Bollier, I explore<br />

how “th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g like a commoner,” might enable a different response to the care crisis. Bollier’s emphasis on<br />

the sociality of use and shared responsibility for commons makes it easier to see how knowledge and<br />

cultural practises can, like physical resources, be commoned. From this perspective, current efforts at coproductive<br />

care reform becomes a politics of common<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Declan Kuch<br />

Solar Citizens: Towards Energy Commons or Regulatory Politics as Usual?<br />

Home battery storage may see a “big disconnect” of households or even towns follow<strong>in</strong>g sharp rises <strong>in</strong><br />

network charges to electricity users. “Solar Citizens” has emerged as a campaign<strong>in</strong>g organisation to battle<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st these network charges. This paper uses the concept of common<strong>in</strong>g to challenge neoliberal discourses<br />

pervade debates about these charges and the political potential of the “Solar Citizens” fight<strong>in</strong>g them. This<br />

civic conception challenges divisions between public and private good that have firmed under neoliberalism<br />

by draw<strong>in</strong>g attention to the ways social justifications are culturally enmeshed with calculations of price.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g comparative <strong>in</strong>ternational data compris<strong>in</strong>g regulations and case studies of energy social enterprises, I<br />

argue that “Solar Citizens” have been important democratis<strong>in</strong>g agents <strong>in</strong> energy plann<strong>in</strong>g. Furthermore,<br />

experimental social enterprises may provide a useful bridge between (a deeply impoverished, yet lively,<br />

national) discourse of <strong>in</strong>novation on one hand, participation for susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>in</strong> a carbon constra<strong>in</strong>ed world.<br />

258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!