08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

creative risk. Briefs describe themselves as “an all-male sharp shoot<strong>in</strong>’ cabaret of burlesque with balls, highfly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

circus bandits & savage gender offenders.” A mash-up of circus, vaudeville, drag and burlesque,<br />

featur<strong>in</strong>g some of Australia’s most prolific contemporary circus artists, Briefs is based <strong>in</strong> Brisbane,<br />

Queensland. Their work has had a highly significant impact on the contemporary circus <strong>in</strong>dustry nationally<br />

and <strong>in</strong>ternationally. They have undertaken successive tours to London, Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh and Berl<strong>in</strong>. Recent reviews<br />

characterize them as an “Aussie Cirque du Soleil meets Ru Paul’s Drag Race”. Performer and creative<br />

director, Fez Fa’anana expla<strong>in</strong>s, “Briefs likes to toy with notions of identity, mascul<strong>in</strong>ity and politics <strong>in</strong> a<br />

glittery way”. By exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the work of Briefs Factory I will demonstrate some of the conceptual frameworks<br />

and thematics that are shap<strong>in</strong>g the structure of my doctoral research <strong>in</strong>to Australian contemporary circus.<br />

Explor<strong>in</strong>g ideas of gender performativity, body theory and the notion of “other”, this paper aims to uncover<br />

the position of Australian contemporary circus companies as <strong>in</strong>novators <strong>in</strong> the art form.<br />

2L<br />

Challeng<strong>in</strong>g academic cultures (Chair, Ruth Barcan)<br />

Ron Krabill<br />

Radical Reciprocity: Challeng<strong>in</strong>g Discourses of Global Citizenship <strong>in</strong> Higher Education<br />

University mission statements worldwide claim that a central goal of higher education is the production of<br />

global citizens. Yet what is meant by a global citizen rema<strong>in</strong>s amorphous, as do the particular mechanisms by<br />

which higher education might construct such citizens. This paper follows Mahmood Mamdani’s work <strong>in</strong><br />

Citizen and Subject (1996) to claim that the discursive production of global citizens <strong>in</strong> higher education<br />

depends on the production of global subjects as well. The construction of the global citizen – enlightened,<br />

cosmopolitan, humanitarian, well-resourced, active – takes shape only <strong>in</strong> contrast to the global subject as<br />

the ignorant, prov<strong>in</strong>cial, violent, impoverished, passive recipient of the citizen’s humanitarian action.<br />

Buttressed by sentimentalism <strong>in</strong> media representations of the humanitarian, students often expect that<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g a global citizen means simultaneously embark<strong>in</strong>g on a humanitarian project of their own <strong>in</strong> the<br />

postcolony, regardless of the impact of that project.<br />

Mayumi Ishikawa*, Junko Otani*, Michael Annear & X<strong>in</strong> Gao* The rise of “world class” universities and chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scholarship <strong>in</strong> Asia: competitions, engagements and representations<br />

The global drive for “world class” universities has transformed Asia’s research universities. They have<br />

become competitors for superior positions <strong>in</strong> the university rank<strong>in</strong>gs, proactively recruit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

students and scholars and publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternationally so as to improve research quality assessment <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />

Such developments foretell different futures for higher education, offer<strong>in</strong>g both hope and concerns for<br />

regional convergence and divergence. On the one hand, globalization <strong>in</strong>creases the contact and mobility of<br />

scholars and students as well as shar<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>formation, values, and questions. It also promotes competition,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased productivity on shared research agendas. On the other hand, the quest for “world<br />

class” universities <strong>in</strong>creases the risk of homogenization by the dom<strong>in</strong>ant use of English and the erosion of<br />

attention to local research agendas. The paper thus asks several questions at the crossroads of future<br />

directions of transform<strong>in</strong>g/globalis<strong>in</strong>g universities.<br />

Claudia Kunschak<br />

Transform<strong>in</strong>g academic culture: Po<strong>in</strong>ts of contention and opportunities for engagement<br />

Globalization has brought with it an <strong>in</strong>ternationalization of academic culture that has both supporters and<br />

detractors but is probably here to stay. Top level adm<strong>in</strong>istrators tend to relish it as it br<strong>in</strong>gs new customers,<br />

markets and <strong>in</strong>come; students mostly support it even though they might not take advantage of all options<br />

now available to them. It is at the mid-level, among faculty and staff, where daily challenges and ideological<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!