08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tend to merely pay lips service to. Although adopt<strong>in</strong>g a “classic rock” radio format, the channel has also<br />

become an important platform for “<strong>in</strong>die” music <strong>in</strong> all most of its local permutations <strong>in</strong> its nighttime and<br />

weekend programm<strong>in</strong>g. This paper explores how BFM has not only played a role <strong>in</strong> the contestation of<br />

Malaysian cultural politics but also as a site of contestation of Malaysian “<strong>in</strong>die-ness” on the airwaves.<br />

6G<br />

<strong>Cultural</strong> policy and plann<strong>in</strong>g (Chair, Ien Ang)<br />

Ianto Ware* & Hugh Nichols*<br />

Age<br />

Culture, Civics and Local Council: Implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Cultural</strong> Policy <strong>in</strong> the Post-Landry<br />

This paper considers John Holden’s 2010 assertion that cultural policy has traditionally been concerned with<br />

“the achievement of targets where people are treated not as <strong>in</strong>dividuals with cultural rights, but as clay to be<br />

worked on.” The authors will speak from their experience with<strong>in</strong> the City of Sydney’s cultural strategy team,<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g to implement the Creative City cultural policy. In do<strong>in</strong>g so, they will consider the potential to move<br />

away from paternalistic notions of “culture” as deliverable, and pursue Just<strong>in</strong> O’Connor’s alternate def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

that, “<strong>Cultural</strong> policy at its broadest is about how we become citizens,” with a focus on agency, participation,<br />

and barrier removal. Draw<strong>in</strong>g from research commissioned by the City through the University of Technology<br />

Sydney, the University of Tasmania, Western Sydney University, and collaboration with the University of<br />

Sydney, methods will be proposed to connect cultural policy with to other areas, such as urban plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Tully Barnett<br />

The Bermuda Triangle of Value: Voids, Gaps and Holes <strong>in</strong> Australian <strong>Cultural</strong> Policy<br />

The 2015 Federal Government Senate Inquiry <strong>in</strong>to the impact of the 20<strong>14</strong> and 2015 Commonwealth Budget<br />

decisions on the Arts received 2719 submissions. The robust response by Australian artists, arts<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrators and the broader community tells us the <strong>in</strong>quiry process was seen as a crucial <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> a<br />

moment of <strong>in</strong>dustry crisis. But it also answered a gap <strong>in</strong> the sector, provid<strong>in</strong>g an avenue for practic<strong>in</strong>g artists<br />

and arts adm<strong>in</strong>istrators to talk about the <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> a way they haven’t been able to do before. This paper<br />

considers the submissions and hear<strong>in</strong>gs testimony as a public body of material construct<strong>in</strong>g the artist and<br />

the state of the arts <strong>in</strong> the present moment under austerity and argues that the process itself was an<br />

important moment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal cultural report<strong>in</strong>g and professional development for <strong>in</strong>dependent artists,<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g to notions of cultural value.<br />

Christen Cornell Ambivalence, Intervention and Beij<strong>in</strong>g’s Urban Change<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Communist Party’s extension of economic reforms <strong>in</strong> 1992, Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s cities have become<br />

sites of dynamism and change, characterised by demolition, construction, and examples of <strong>in</strong>formal or<br />

“illegal” urbanism. This paper discusses my research of the Beij<strong>in</strong>g arts community, Caochangdi – an art<br />

district constructed “illegally” on what was once the outskirts of the city and s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>corporated with<strong>in</strong> Party<br />

def<strong>in</strong>itions of the “official” urban landscape. How, it asks, might Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s post-reform spatial change have<br />

provided the conditions for new forms of political <strong>in</strong>tervention, particularly given the lack of participatory<br />

democratic <strong>in</strong>stitutions with<strong>in</strong> the country? More specifically, how might these artists have exploited the<br />

ambivalence with<strong>in</strong> the country’s spatial bureaucracy to build <strong>in</strong>stitutions, literally and collectively, at the<br />

everyday surface of urban change?<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!