08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g together objects and subjects of conflict, disagreement and difference, and how this <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

(and its analysis) can enrich academic work on media and conflict.<br />

Tomoaki Morikawa<br />

Ground Zero as a Hallowed/Hollowed Ground<br />

This paper explores the contentious nature of the memory of 9/11 by focus<strong>in</strong>g on the issue of slavery.<br />

Although slavery is not an issue that is usually associated with 9/11, this paper argues that it needs to be<br />

rethought through <strong>in</strong> the context of the terrorist attacks, because the commemoration of 9/11 has<br />

functioned as an ideological state apparatus of memory through which to facilitate the erasure of public<br />

memory of this violent system of human bondage from American history so as to produce and reproduce a<br />

national historical narrative. This paper attends to three case studies of commemoration: the International<br />

Freedom Center, the African Burial Ground <strong>in</strong> Lower Manhattan, and the symbolic primary build<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

new World Trade Center complex. Through these case studies, it will exam<strong>in</strong>e the ways <strong>in</strong> which Ground<br />

Zero has been reconstructed <strong>in</strong> ways to silence the public memory of slavery.<br />

Birgit Kleist Pedersen* & Jette Rygaard* Do people really live <strong>in</strong> Greenland? <strong>Cultural</strong> representations <strong>in</strong><br />

documentaries with Greenland as a backdrop<br />

Greenland be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a process of tak<strong>in</strong>g the next step towards Autonomy, an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of reverse<br />

discourses seem to be <strong>in</strong> game. The presentation will focus on the ascribed as well as the self-ascribed<br />

cultural representations of Greenland and Greenlanders/Inuit as depicted <strong>in</strong> documentaries from around the<br />

turn of the Millennium until now. The discussions will revolve around questions such as: When are films<br />

about Greenland even represent<strong>in</strong>g Greenlanders/Inuit and reversely, when they are, what k<strong>in</strong>d of mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

does this produce: when is this problematic, and when is this even an advantage? Further on, the<br />

presentation will touch upon the issue of the impact of the tradition of ethnographic films about Greenland<br />

produced by Greenlanders and non-Greenlanders respectively till today. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the presentation will discuss<br />

whether and how the “traditional” representation of Greenland is <strong>in</strong>cluded – <strong>in</strong> what way and for what<br />

reasons, if so.<br />

9V<br />

Wayward Politics (Chair, Nad<strong>in</strong>e Attewell)<br />

Christopher Patterson Wayward and Willful Women <strong>in</strong> Wayne Wang’s Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Box<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese migrants to America have traditionally come from Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s h<strong>in</strong>terlands (Taiwan, Guangdong, Hong<br />

Kong), and their historical presence, s<strong>in</strong>ce the Cold War, has provided a view of Ch<strong>in</strong>eseness that contrasts<br />

the People’s Republic, which has functioned as the “other” to American liberalism. This presentation<br />

considers narratives of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese migrancy by explor<strong>in</strong>g contrast<strong>in</strong>g attitudes towards migrants from the<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese ma<strong>in</strong>land to the h<strong>in</strong>terlands and f<strong>in</strong>ally to the West. These narratives split most dramatically <strong>in</strong><br />

view<strong>in</strong>g migrants as either “wayward subjects,” migrants who become “corrupted” by foreign <strong>in</strong>fluence, or<br />

as “willful subjects,” migrants whose disobedience is seen as express<strong>in</strong>g agency and desire for freedom. I<br />

consider how both of these views of migrancy are re-<strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> Wayne Wang’s film about the 1997<br />

handover of Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Box (2007). I engage with Alys We<strong>in</strong>baum’s theories of waywardness as<br />

“constitut[<strong>in</strong>g] the motor of national belong<strong>in</strong>g,” (27) and Sara Ahmed’s theory of willful subjects as those<br />

imbued with ungovernable agency and desire. I ask how these figures are imbricated with<strong>in</strong> overarch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

structures of global capitalism across Asia, and how they can call attention to other groups (Filip<strong>in</strong>as,<br />

Indonesians, South Asians) who have played formative roles <strong>in</strong> construct<strong>in</strong>g global Ch<strong>in</strong>eseness.<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!