Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
shift<strong>in</strong>g focus from conceptualis<strong>in</strong>g data as ‘knowledge’ per se and <strong>in</strong>stead focus on what and how people<br />
learn through their experience of data and how these learn<strong>in</strong>g cultures can be understood <strong>in</strong> a wider<br />
pedagogical context.<br />
3L<br />
Knowledge production, boundary cross<strong>in</strong>g and difference (Chair, Anna Hickey-Moody)<br />
Rob Garbutt<br />
Pay<strong>in</strong>g attention <strong>in</strong> others’ worlds<br />
<strong>Cultural</strong> studies research that develops as research with others rather than as research about, often evokes<br />
ontological politics between the worldviews of the researcher and those the researcher is with. How does<br />
one chart a path when one experiences the <strong>in</strong>trusion of world of be<strong>in</strong>gs that demand a cooperative and<br />
creative response? The path taken here first dwells on Isabel Stengers’ (2015, 57-66) urg<strong>in</strong>g to respond to<br />
the <strong>in</strong>trusion of other worlds by relearn<strong>in</strong>g to pay attention, even to remake our ways of pay<strong>in</strong>g care-full<br />
attention. To this end Bruno Latour’s (2013) exploration of modes of existence is useful. Latour provides a<br />
cultural researcher such as myself, who is steeped <strong>in</strong> Western empiricism, a palette of modes of exist<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
extends my depleted ontological landscape, and that <strong>in</strong> turn resensitises the possibilities for pay<strong>in</strong>g<br />
attention. This enables one to attend <strong>in</strong> ways that don’t require re-form<strong>in</strong>g the world of others <strong>in</strong> the shape<br />
of one’s own. Such considerations are illustrated through co-research<strong>in</strong>g Aborig<strong>in</strong>al heritage and human<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Helen Fordham Translat<strong>in</strong>g Difference: The function of the public <strong>in</strong>tellectual <strong>in</strong> a globalised world<br />
Globalisation has destabilised the structures, ideologies and power relations that have traditionally<br />
scaffolded the function of the western public <strong>in</strong>tellectual. The impact of these shifts was made visible <strong>in</strong> a<br />
series of media polls held <strong>in</strong> the first decade of the 21st century which specifically sought <strong>in</strong>tellectuals who<br />
spoke across borders. The poll results revealed the expanded and mediatised nature of the <strong>in</strong>tellectual’s<br />
contemporary public engagements and made evident the way <strong>in</strong> which the entity of the public <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />
can be deployed by power to legitimate particular geopolitical perspectives. This paper <strong>in</strong>vokes these polls <strong>in</strong><br />
order to consider the role of the public <strong>in</strong>tellectual <strong>in</strong> a globalised world. It argues that despite the shifts that<br />
have enabled a plurality of <strong>in</strong>tellectual performances, the function of the <strong>in</strong>tellectual rema<strong>in</strong>s unchanged: it<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ues to foster community through the public debate that seeks to hold power accountable. Yet, despite<br />
the constancy of this function, it is also clear that the entity takes part <strong>in</strong> a broader process of public<br />
<strong>in</strong>tellectualism not as an authority but as an <strong>in</strong>terpreter, translator and negotiator of differences.<br />
Cecilia Ferm Almqvist Cross roads, cross<strong>in</strong>g borders, and meet<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the common world; a sociological<br />
phenomenological view on cross boundary research – Spotify as a case<br />
The presentation will enlighten and discuss the need and challenges of border-cross<strong>in</strong>g research, when<br />
complex phenomena that <strong>in</strong>clude art, technology and Bildung are to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated. A develop<strong>in</strong>g project<br />
Evolv<strong>in</strong>g Bildung <strong>in</strong> the nexus of stream<strong>in</strong>g services, art and users - Spotify as a case will function as a<br />
start<strong>in</strong>g-po<strong>in</strong>t for a reason<strong>in</strong>g regard<strong>in</strong>g what constitutes border-cross<strong>in</strong>g research, and what dilemmas as<br />
well as new meet<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts that appear <strong>in</strong> a process where border cross<strong>in</strong>g is at stake. Material to make an<br />
analysis possible was gathered dur<strong>in</strong>g a lunch-to-lunch symposium where scholars from music education,<br />
musicology, psychology, media and communication, English literature, management, Big-data, and sound<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g met and discussed collaboration <strong>in</strong> relation to the mentioned project. The material was analyzed<br />
from a sociological phenomenological perspective. The result of the analysis shows the challenges with, and<br />
importance of, meet<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the common world to make border-cross<strong>in</strong>g research possible, at the same time<br />
91