Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9D<br />
Capitalis<strong>in</strong>g culture: critique and renewal (Chair, Tony Bennett)<br />
This panel draws on research currently ongo<strong>in</strong>g for the project Australian <strong>Cultural</strong> Fields: National and Transational<br />
Dynamics funded by the Australian Research Council. It draws on the survey and <strong>in</strong>terview material produced by the<br />
study to presents three critical engagements with cultural capital theory related to its application to three sets of<br />
socio-cultural relations.<br />
Tim Rowse<br />
Tastes for Indigenous Culture<br />
Is there such as a th<strong>in</strong>g as “taste for Indigenous culture” <strong>in</strong> Australia today? If there is, can we measure it<br />
empirically and discover its social distribution? This paper will explore the data generated by a survey<br />
(n=1202) for the “Australian <strong>Cultural</strong> Fields” Project <strong>in</strong> 2015. The survey <strong>in</strong>cluded items that we understand<br />
to be Indigenous “th<strong>in</strong>gs”, authors, or performers (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sports stars). The data thus allow us to pose and<br />
answer a number of questions. What “Indigenous items” are well known and liked? What are the social<br />
characteristic (class, education level, sex age) of those who know and like these Indigenous th<strong>in</strong>gs/people?<br />
The survey also asked respondents what they did not like, and so we can ask: what are the social<br />
characteristics of those who express distaste for the Indigenous items <strong>in</strong> the ACF survey? In this paper, we<br />
will report data that allow us to explore whether taste (or distaste) for Indigenous th<strong>in</strong>gs is uniform – its<br />
levels and social composition – across six fields of cultural production (Visual Arts, Music, Literature,<br />
Heritage, Sport and Television).<br />
Tony Bennett<br />
Putt<strong>in</strong>g culture <strong>in</strong>to class<br />
In this paper we reflect on the different ways <strong>in</strong> which the concerns of culture analysis and class analysis<br />
have been brought together <strong>in</strong> the history of cultural capital research and on the limitations and future<br />
prospects for the future analysis of class/culture conjunctions this tradition represents. We do so by first<br />
review<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the Australian <strong>Cultural</strong> Fields project concern<strong>in</strong>g the organisation of classed tastes<br />
across the different cultural fields – visual art, heritage, literature, television, sport, and music – exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
the project. We than compare the implications of these f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs for the analysis of class culture relations<br />
with those aris<strong>in</strong>g the accounts of the relations between class, culture and <strong>in</strong>equality emerg<strong>in</strong>g from two<br />
recent surveys of cultural tastes and practices <strong>in</strong> the UK and Australia: the Great British Class Survey and the<br />
ANU Social Class <strong>in</strong> Australia Poll.<br />
Greg Noble & Anna Pertierra<br />
Ethnicis<strong>in</strong>g Australian cultural consumption<br />
This paper explores the consequences of cultural diversity for the social organisation of cultural consumption<br />
<strong>in</strong> Australia. Migration has always been fundamental to the constitution of colonial and national formations<br />
on this cont<strong>in</strong>ent. Yet the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g ethnic and l<strong>in</strong>guistic diversity of Australia’s migration patterns – and the<br />
generational changes that ensue – have produced a diversification of cultural production and consumption<br />
seen <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g array of goods, sites, audiences and <strong>in</strong>stitutions. Such diversification <strong>in</strong> the cultural<br />
practices of Australians does not always map neatly onto the rigid notions of ethnic community recognised<br />
by multicultural and cultural policy. This paper will draw from <strong>in</strong>terviews with members of particular,<br />
ethnically-def<strong>in</strong>ed cohorts as well as from the broader cohort of participants <strong>in</strong> the Australian <strong>Cultural</strong> Fields<br />
project, to address a number of questions: – are there patterns of cultural consumption that correspond to<br />
ethnically-def<strong>in</strong>ed communities? – to what extent have “ma<strong>in</strong>stream” practices been reshaped by recent<br />
transformations to cultural diversity? – what do <strong>in</strong>terviewees tell us about the relations between Australian,<br />
diasporic and transnational orientations <strong>in</strong> cultural practices?<br />
222