08.12.2016 Views

Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference 14-17th December 2016 Program Index

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

Crossroads-2016-final-draft-program-30-Nov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and young people. In do<strong>in</strong>g so, I consider the saliency of the juncture between cultural studies, educational<br />

theory and youth studies for th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g beyond, through a reconceptualisation of Indigenous childhood and<br />

youth via what I term “acts of regeneration”.<br />

Charlotte Craw Design<strong>in</strong>g for democracy: Visualis<strong>in</strong>g parliamentary processes <strong>in</strong> Aborig<strong>in</strong>al and Torres Strait Islander<br />

electoral education, 1962-1990<br />

In this paper, I analyse historical examples of electoral education materials produced specifically for<br />

Aborig<strong>in</strong>al and Torres Strait Islander audiences. Created after the universalisation of Aborig<strong>in</strong>al suffrage <strong>in</strong><br />

1962, these materials endeavour to visualise the <strong>in</strong>frastructure and processes of the Australian<br />

parliamentary system for communities with very different governance structures. They employ a variety of<br />

strategies rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1960s flashcards to the 1988 comic book The Phantom Enrols and Votes, the first<br />

Phantom comic to be set <strong>in</strong> Australia. By compar<strong>in</strong>g and contrast<strong>in</strong>g the earliest attempts with later<br />

examples produced <strong>in</strong> the 1970s and 1980s, I reflect on the ways <strong>in</strong> which the visual and narrative elements<br />

of these materials reflect important social and political changes <strong>in</strong> the conception of democracy, civics<br />

education and the representation of Indigenous Australian peoples’ political agency.<br />

1C<br />

Mediated Intimacies: Bodies, Relationships, Technologies (Chair, Sarah Baker)<br />

Alison W<strong>in</strong>ch<br />

Mediated Intimacies: Bodies, Relationships, Technologies<br />

This paper reflects on the key themes that have emerged from the special issue of Journal of Gender <strong>Studies</strong><br />

(forthcom<strong>in</strong>g 2017) that this panel is co-edit<strong>in</strong>g on “Mediated Intimacies: bodies, relationships,<br />

technologies”. The special issue <strong>in</strong>vestigates the ways that a media convergence culture represents,<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervenes <strong>in</strong>, exploits and enables <strong>in</strong>timate relations. In particular it looks at the various ways that <strong>in</strong>timacy<br />

is be<strong>in</strong>g reconfigured <strong>in</strong> response to the specific historical conditions of the neoliberal conjuncture. On the<br />

one hand we are liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> atomized and <strong>in</strong>dividualistic times where relationships are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly strategic<br />

and competitive. On the other the media has become, as Beverly Skeggs argues, <strong>in</strong>tensely <strong>in</strong>timate. This<br />

paper <strong>in</strong>terrogates the concept of mediated <strong>in</strong>timacies. What are the different configurations of <strong>in</strong>timacy<br />

possible <strong>in</strong> the neoliberal conjuncture? Are they different from what went on before? Is the notion of<br />

<strong>in</strong>timacy chang<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to the affordances of different technologies? Are there new concepts of<br />

<strong>in</strong>timacy emerg<strong>in</strong>g? Are some forms of <strong>in</strong>timacy enabled and others constra<strong>in</strong>ed by the multiplicity of<br />

platforms that offer opportunities for connections with others as well as with oneself?<br />

Misha Kavka & Rachel Berryman* “I Guess A Lot of People See Me as a Big Sister or a Friend”: The Role of<br />

Intimacy <strong>in</strong> the Celebrification of Beauty Vloggers<br />

With an impressive eleven million subscribers, Zoe “Zoella” Sugg is among the most popular of the young<br />

adults who have recently obta<strong>in</strong>ed fame (and fortune) by post<strong>in</strong>g videos to YouTube. She figures<br />

prom<strong>in</strong>ently <strong>in</strong> the beauty group, one of the fastest-grow<strong>in</strong>g and most overtly fem<strong>in</strong>ised subsets of the<br />

YouTube community, creat<strong>in</strong>g videos on lifestyle, fashion and beauty-related topics. However, to a greater<br />

extent than many of her peers, Sugg supports her product-oriented videos with vlogs that offer beh<strong>in</strong>d-thescenes,<br />

<strong>in</strong>timate access to her life(style). In so do<strong>in</strong>g, Zoe’s videos encourage <strong>in</strong>timacy not simply between<br />

her viewers and the “big sister” persona she adopts on-screen, but also between her audience and the<br />

commodities she associates herself with. This article argues that the success of the YouTube “<strong>in</strong>fluencer”<br />

economy, both <strong>in</strong> terms of its gender predispositions and celebrity effects, depends on processes of<br />

commodification through <strong>in</strong>timacy, which Zoe Sugg mobilises <strong>in</strong> exemplary fashion.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!