10.12.2012 Views

Protocols for Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits

Protocols for Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits

Protocols for Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

452<br />

M.G. OSTROLUCKÁ ET AL.<br />

2.6.3. PCR–ISSR<br />

For ISSR technique 3´OH anchored primers [(CA)6GT, (GAG)3GC, (GT)6CC,<br />

(GA)9C] <strong>and</strong> 5´OH anchored primer GT(CA)4 were used. Amplification reactions<br />

were per<strong>for</strong>med in 25 µl <strong>of</strong> reaction volume containing 20 mmol × dm –3 Tris-HCl<br />

(pH 8.0), 50 mmol × dm –3 KCl, 3 mmol × dm –3 MgCl2, 0.1 mmol × dm –3 dNTPs, 0.4<br />

µmol × dm –3 primer, 1U Taq polymerase <strong>and</strong> 30 ng <strong>of</strong> DNA. All reactions were<br />

heated to 94°C <strong>for</strong> 2 min, followed by 45 cycles <strong>of</strong> 94°C <strong>for</strong> 1 min, 55°C <strong>for</strong> 1 min<br />

<strong>and</strong> 72°C <strong>for</strong> 3 min. Polymerisation was followed by final extension cycle <strong>of</strong> 72°C<br />

<strong>for</strong> 10 min.<br />

2.6.4. Electrophoresis <strong>and</strong> PCR Products Evaluation<br />

The amplification PCR–ISSR products were separated by electrophoresis on 2%<br />

(w/v) agarose gel (120 V, 80 mA). Electrophoregrams were evaluated by KODAK<br />

EDAS 190 1D s<strong>of</strong>tware (Figure 4) where the size (in bp) <strong>of</strong> individual DNA b<strong>and</strong>s<br />

was recorded. DNA b<strong>and</strong>s were retrieved based on their size <strong>and</strong> these in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

was transferred into Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel Application where the size was replaced by<br />

binary 1 (<strong>for</strong> present b<strong>and</strong> on specific position) or 0 (<strong>for</strong> absent b<strong>and</strong>). Consequently,<br />

Nei <strong>and</strong> Li (1979) similarity index (SINL) based on ISSR pr<strong>of</strong>iles was calculated in<br />

the MS Excel according to the SINL = 2 × sum <strong>of</strong> common b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> lane A <strong>and</strong> B/<br />

(sum <strong>of</strong> the b<strong>and</strong>s in the lane A + sum <strong>of</strong> the b<strong>and</strong>s in the lane B).<br />

Figure 4. ISSR pr<strong>of</strong>ile using primer (GT) 6CC evaluated by KODAK EDAS 190 1D s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

M-250 bp ladder, 1–4 Berkeley, 5–7 ‘Bluecrop’, 8 ‘Blueray’, 9 ‘Darrow’, 10 ‘Linnea’.<br />

Distance index (DINL) values were calculated according to the DINL=1 – SINL.<br />

Dendrograms were constructed using UPGMA (Unweighted Pair-Group Method<br />

Using Arithmetic Averages) analysis <strong>for</strong> the objective position <strong>of</strong> ISSR in the<br />

statistical program SYNTAX. Dissimilarity <strong>of</strong> every single cluster is showed by the<br />

Euclidian Distance Averages <strong>of</strong> Clusters (EDAC).<br />

The group <strong>of</strong> tested genotypes was divided into two main clusters (Figure 5).<br />

First group consists <strong>of</strong> ‘Bluecrop’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Berkeley’ genotypes with an average GINL<br />

0.308. Second group consist <strong>of</strong> three individual genotypes, two <strong>of</strong> species V.<br />

corymbosum (‘Blueray’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Darrow’) <strong>and</strong> one <strong>of</strong> species V. vitis-idaea (‘Linnea’)<br />

with an average GINL 0.552. The polymorphism <strong>of</strong> analyzed samples varied from<br />

96% to 99% depending on the used primer. Unique b<strong>and</strong>s appeared in very low

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!