motivational analysis of organizations
motivational analysis of organizations
motivational analysis of organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
164 ❘❚<br />
3. Guiding subordinates in planning activities;<br />
4. Evaluating the outcomes <strong>of</strong> activities;<br />
5. Helping to plan future activities on the basis <strong>of</strong> past experiences; and<br />
6. Rewarding subordinates for satisfactory or superior work.<br />
Understanding the Needs <strong>of</strong> Subordinates<br />
An effective supervisor understands how individual subordinates are motivated and<br />
what their needs are. Such understanding helps in assessing their tasks and performance<br />
and then later in guiding future activities.<br />
Continual Evaluation<br />
To guide subordinates effectively, a supervisor must observe their activities. Because a<br />
manager may have a very limited amount <strong>of</strong> time to observe all subordinates, a<br />
mechanism should be developed for obtaining and maintaining information about their<br />
various activities. Periodic discussions with individual subordinates can be helpful in<br />
obtaining such information.<br />
Guidance in Planning Activities<br />
Supervision also involves helping subordinates to plan their activities. This may include<br />
providing information and helping to set goals and priorities.<br />
Providing Rewards<br />
Managing also has a <strong>motivational</strong> aspect: rewarding workers when they accomplish<br />
something worthwhile. When a supervisor fails to do this, employees’ <strong>motivational</strong><br />
levels drop. Rewards need not always be monetary; receiving greater responsibility or a<br />
verbal expression <strong>of</strong> appreciation can be highly rewarding to subordinates.<br />
STYLES OF SUPERVISION<br />
Although every supervisor is unique in some way, certain supervisory styles are<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> managers. Any manager may incorporate more than one<br />
<strong>of</strong> these styles into his or her own, depending on the situation.<br />
Authoritarian and Democratic Styles<br />
Lippitt and White (1943) identify two types <strong>of</strong> leaders: authoritarian and democratic.<br />
The authoritarian leader determines all policies and strategies, decides on the<br />
composition and tasks <strong>of</strong> the work teams, is personal in giving praise and criticism, and<br />
maintains some personal distance from employees. In contrast, the democratic leader<br />
ensures that policies and strategies are determined by the group, gives technical advice<br />
whenever the group needs it, allows freedom to group members to choose their work<br />
The Pfeiffer Library Volume 19, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer