12.12.2012 Views

motivational analysis of organizations

motivational analysis of organizations

motivational analysis of organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

more than the overall average), 30 percent to traditional management (2 percent less<br />

than the overall average), 20 percent to networking (1 percent more than the overall<br />

average), and 20 percent to human resource management (the same as the overall<br />

average).<br />

In summarizing their study, Luthans et al. point out that the most “successful”<br />

managers engage in 70 percent more networking activities and 40 percent fewer<br />

traditional management activities than their “effective” counterparts. In fact, the authors<br />

found that managers seem to not be doing what management texts say they should be<br />

doing. Nor is the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> a “successful” or “effective” manager particularly consistent<br />

with what actual managers say a manager should do. In addition, the authors encourage<br />

their readers to ask whether <strong>organizations</strong> are rewarding the wrong people (“successful”<br />

managers) or rewarding the right people (“effective” managers) in the wrong way. They<br />

also urge <strong>organizations</strong> to identify ways to encourage the development <strong>of</strong> more<br />

“successful and effective” managers.<br />

Management Competencies in the Age <strong>of</strong> Hypercompetition<br />

Finally, a study by D’Aveni (1995) identifies seven competencies that managers must<br />

demonstrate if their employers are to cope successfully with the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />

hypercompetition in the mid-1990s. D’Aveni’s framework mandates that managers<br />

become skilled at:<br />

1. Satisfying customers before employees and investors.<br />

2. Envisioning future trends and creating appropriate self-fulfilling prophecies.<br />

3. Constantly disrupting the status quo.<br />

4. Being the first to create new competitive advantages.<br />

5. Continually shifting the rules <strong>of</strong> the game plan and then updating the plan.<br />

6. Announcing the organization’s vision to everyone and being highly visible.<br />

7. Utilizing competitive thrusts to upset the status quo and opening new<br />

opportunities (innovating).<br />

This entrepreneurial call to arms reflects similar models contained in Reagan<br />

(1996), Peters (1994), and Pinchot (1985). These studies all urge managers and their<br />

employers to become more risk taking, innovative, rule bending, and—in Peters’ case—<br />

“weird.” The bottom line is that traditional PLOCS-based, management-training<br />

programs show little ability to help managers obtain successful careers.<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 19, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!