motivational analysis of organizations
motivational analysis of organizations
motivational analysis of organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
more than the overall average), 30 percent to traditional management (2 percent less<br />
than the overall average), 20 percent to networking (1 percent more than the overall<br />
average), and 20 percent to human resource management (the same as the overall<br />
average).<br />
In summarizing their study, Luthans et al. point out that the most “successful”<br />
managers engage in 70 percent more networking activities and 40 percent fewer<br />
traditional management activities than their “effective” counterparts. In fact, the authors<br />
found that managers seem to not be doing what management texts say they should be<br />
doing. Nor is the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> a “successful” or “effective” manager particularly consistent<br />
with what actual managers say a manager should do. In addition, the authors encourage<br />
their readers to ask whether <strong>organizations</strong> are rewarding the wrong people (“successful”<br />
managers) or rewarding the right people (“effective” managers) in the wrong way. They<br />
also urge <strong>organizations</strong> to identify ways to encourage the development <strong>of</strong> more<br />
“successful and effective” managers.<br />
Management Competencies in the Age <strong>of</strong> Hypercompetition<br />
Finally, a study by D’Aveni (1995) identifies seven competencies that managers must<br />
demonstrate if their employers are to cope successfully with the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />
hypercompetition in the mid-1990s. D’Aveni’s framework mandates that managers<br />
become skilled at:<br />
1. Satisfying customers before employees and investors.<br />
2. Envisioning future trends and creating appropriate self-fulfilling prophecies.<br />
3. Constantly disrupting the status quo.<br />
4. Being the first to create new competitive advantages.<br />
5. Continually shifting the rules <strong>of</strong> the game plan and then updating the plan.<br />
6. Announcing the organization’s vision to everyone and being highly visible.<br />
7. Utilizing competitive thrusts to upset the status quo and opening new<br />
opportunities (innovating).<br />
This entrepreneurial call to arms reflects similar models contained in Reagan<br />
(1996), Peters (1994), and Pinchot (1985). These studies all urge managers and their<br />
employers to become more risk taking, innovative, rule bending, and—in Peters’ case—<br />
“weird.” The bottom line is that traditional PLOCS-based, management-training<br />
programs show little ability to help managers obtain successful careers.<br />
The Pfeiffer Library Volume 19, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 199