12.12.2012 Views

motivational analysis of organizations

motivational analysis of organizations

motivational analysis of organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

178 ❘❚<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> achievement, or with knowledge, or with prestige. You can provide opportunities for them<br />

to obtain these satisfactions through efforts directed toward organizational goals. What is even<br />

more important, the supply <strong>of</strong> such opportunities—unlike the supply <strong>of</strong> money—is unlimited.<br />

(1966, pp. 44-45)<br />

Jacoby and Terborg (1986), in their “Managerial Philosophies Scale,” make the<br />

following observations about Theory X and Theory Y behaviors:<br />

Berelson and Steiner, in their classic book, Human Behavior (New York: Harcourt Brace), list<br />

1,045 findings from scientific studies <strong>of</strong> human behavior . . . . Strong support is advanced by<br />

Berelson and Steiner for McGregor’s Theory Y as a simple restatement <strong>of</strong> the characteristics<br />

shown by scientific research to be typical for the “average” person in our culture. Thus, the<br />

probability is .68, or greater than 2 to 1, that people encountered by managers will possess<br />

characteristics and, under proper conditions, display traits consistent with Theory Y expectations.<br />

(p. 4)<br />

Since McGregor’s introduction <strong>of</strong> the terms, <strong>organizations</strong> have shown a shift from<br />

an obvious Theory X orientation to an apparent Theory Y orientation. Berelson and<br />

Steiner’s conclusion that 68 percent <strong>of</strong> employees hold Theory Y beliefs supports the<br />

idea that a Theory Y management orientation will be appropriate most <strong>of</strong> the time for<br />

most employees. The shift in <strong>organizations</strong> toward a Theory Y orientation has resulted<br />

in an interesting phenomenon. Some managers have developed the rhetoric <strong>of</strong> Theory Y<br />

while exhibiting behavior that indicates Theory X assumptions. As a result, these<br />

managers give an illusion <strong>of</strong> a Theory Y orientation that is in fact a disguised Theory X<br />

orientation. The mixed X-Y messages that result can create distrust and ineffectiveness.<br />

Managers can build trust and contribute to improved organizational effectiveness by<br />

demonstrating consistency between what they say and what they do.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Jacoby, J., & Terborg, J.R. (1986). Managerial philosophies scale. The Woodlands, TX: Teleometrics<br />

International.<br />

McGregor, D.M. (1957). The human side <strong>of</strong> enterprise. The Management Review, 46(11), 26.<br />

McGregor, D.M. (1966). A philosophy <strong>of</strong> management. In W.G. Bennis & E.H. Schein (Eds.), with the<br />

collaboration <strong>of</strong> C. McGregor, Leadership and Motivation: Essays <strong>of</strong> Douglas McGregor. Cambridge, MA:<br />

M.I.T. Press.<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 19, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!