19.12.2012 Views

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

an inventory or survey. These parameters depend on the life form <strong>of</strong> the plant as well<br />

as the plant part harvested. This is discussed in more detail by Peters (1996; 1999).<br />

3.2.2.2 Taxonomy<br />

It is essential to know which species are being enumerated and, in conjunction with<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> economic and ethnobotany, which species have potential utility. Without<br />

reference to a sound taxonomic base, an accurate assessment <strong>of</strong> the resource being<br />

enumerated is not possible. Where there is doubt surrounding the identification <strong>of</strong> a<br />

species, voucher specimens should be taken. This process need not be undertaken for<br />

each individual within a sample area, but representative samples can be taken for<br />

“morpho-species” (de Walt et al., 1999) 1 . In addition to providing crucial information<br />

about the resource base, knowledge <strong>of</strong> the taxonomy <strong>of</strong> the species concerned also<br />

provides invaluable information with regard to the relationship between the rattan<br />

flora and the wider vegetation.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> previous inventories in Africa that have included rattan have been<br />

somewhat constrained by a poor understanding <strong>of</strong> the taxonomic base (CRSFP, 1994;<br />

Wong, 1997), or have relied on local nomenclature that is not always congruent with<br />

western taxonomy (van Dijk, 1995; van Dijk, 1999). Unfortunately, in such cases the<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> a rigorous baseline reference means that such surveys have little application<br />

for the coherent management <strong>of</strong> the rattan resource.<br />

3.2.2.3 Stem length vs harvestable length<br />

Stem length, as well as the number <strong>of</strong> stems per unit area, are the most crucial<br />

parameter for determining potential yield in rattans. However, there is some difference<br />

between total stem length and harvestable stem length (Bøgh, 1996; <strong>Sunderland</strong> and<br />

Dransfield, in press). Rattan stems selected for harvesting are those mature stems<br />

without the lower leaves (i.e. where the leaf sheaths have sloughed <strong>of</strong>f). It is usual that<br />

only the basal 10-20m is harvested. The upper “green” part <strong>of</strong> the cane is too s<strong>of</strong>t and<br />

inflexible for transformation and is <strong>of</strong>ten left in the canopy. Hence, to ascertain the<br />

true yield per hectare <strong>of</strong> a species, both total and harvestable stem lengths must be<br />

measured.<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!