19.12.2012 Views

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.4.3 Life form<br />

Life-form classification has been the subject <strong>of</strong> much debate, particularly with regard<br />

to the relative influence <strong>of</strong> universality versus utility; (Berlin et al., 1973; Brown,<br />

1977; Berlin, 1977; Hunn, 1982; Atran, 1983; Berlin, 1992; Ellen, 1998). In general,<br />

life forms are broad classes usually recognised by their distinctive morphology<br />

(Berlin, 1973; Berlin et al., 1973; Berlin, 1992). Berlin views the life- form categories<br />

<strong>of</strong> folk systematics as very similar to those <strong>of</strong> early classical botanical classification<br />

(see Atran, 1983) involving the major categories, “tree”, “vine” and “herb” (Berlin,<br />

1977). Indeed, so universal is the application <strong>of</strong> these life form categories that Berlin<br />

suggests that:<br />

“These three major groupings represent such distinct perceptual discontinuities that their recognition<br />

may constitute a substantive near-universal in pre-scientific man’s view <strong>of</strong> the world”. (Berlin, 1977:<br />

385).<br />

However, it has been noted that other life forms may also be recognised according to<br />

their utility or ecological distribution, as well as morphological discontinuities; or<br />

indeed a combination <strong>of</strong> these (Hunn, 1982; Atran, 1983; Randall and Hunn, 1984).<br />

Hence, in most folk taxonomies there may be more than the three major life form<br />

categories suggested by Berlin.<br />

6.4.4 Intermediates<br />

Intermediates are small groupings <strong>of</strong> generics (see below) that are similar to each<br />

other through shared morphological or functional characters and are intermediates<br />

because they fall in between life forms and generics. These are also <strong>of</strong>ten referred to<br />

as “covert categories” as they are <strong>of</strong>ten unnamed and not easily undetected in folk<br />

systematics, or they may be only known by a small subsection <strong>of</strong> a community<br />

(Berlin, 1973; Martin, 1995).<br />

6.4.5 Generics<br />

These are the most salient categories in folk classification systems and as such are the<br />

most commonly encountered during initial ethnobotanical surveys. Generics are the<br />

smallest units in nature that are easily recognised on the basis <strong>of</strong> relatively large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> gross morphological characters. The majority <strong>of</strong> generic taxa within folk<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!