19.12.2012 Views

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As Peters (1996) rightly points out, however, accurately measuring the length <strong>of</strong> a<br />

rattan stem that can climb up to 150m into the forest canopy is fraught with logistical<br />

problems. Actual measurement <strong>of</strong> stem length is almost impossible and “rough<br />

estimation” does not provide the accuracy required for inventory purposes (Nur<br />

supardi et al., 1996). Shim (1989) and Lee (1993), in their studies <strong>of</strong> Calamus in Asia,<br />

found that the internode length for most species <strong>of</strong> rattan is relatively constant. By<br />

calculating the mean internode length and multiplying by the number <strong>of</strong> internodes on<br />

each stem, it is possible to determine the total stem length in a manner that is<br />

relatively accurate.<br />

Unfortunately, the mature (and harvestable) cane length is devoid <strong>of</strong> leaves and hence<br />

internodes, and cannot be measured in this way. However, as this represents the<br />

proximal portion <strong>of</strong> the stem, this portion can be more accurately measured by more<br />

conventional means such as with a tape or a calibrated stick. In applying a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> these two methods <strong>of</strong> stem measurement provides an extremely<br />

accurate means <strong>of</strong> determining stem length can be achieved.<br />

3.2.2.4 Plot shape and size<br />

Considerable discussion has surrounded the determination <strong>of</strong> plot shape and size with<br />

regard to forest mensuration and these have been reviewed in the rattan context by<br />

Stockdale and Wright (1994) and Nur Supardi (1999) and the wider NTFP context,<br />

including rattan, by Peters (1996). Stockdale and Wright (1994) conclude that<br />

rectangular plots, oriented parallel to the direction <strong>of</strong> the slope, are more cost efficient,<br />

and within the desired level <strong>of</strong> precision, than square plots. However, Peters (1996)<br />

concluded that rectangular enumeration plots are prone to errors in boundary<br />

identification and area estimation, and advocates the use <strong>of</strong> square, or circular,<br />

research plots for NTFPs.<br />

Beyond the fact that larger individual organisms require larger sample plots, there are,<br />

in general few guidelines that govern the selection <strong>of</strong> an appropriate plot size for<br />

vegetation sampling. In the case <strong>of</strong> rattans, quite large sample sizes are needed if<br />

1 Individuals clearly <strong>of</strong> the same (albeit unidentified) species within the sample area. Only a single<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!