19.12.2012 Views

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

list of figures - Terry Sunderland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER SIX<br />

INDIGENOUS NOMENCLATURE, CLASSIFICATION AND<br />

6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

UTILISATION OF AFRICAN RATTANS<br />

The recording <strong>of</strong> vernacular names as part <strong>of</strong> ethnobotanical research has become<br />

routine so that contemporary works on ethnobotany provide detailed methodologies<br />

on how to collect local nomenclatural information (Given and Harris, 1994; Martin,<br />

1995; Alexiades, 1996). Whilst the limitations <strong>of</strong> studying vernacular names in<br />

isolation have been recognised (Wilkie and Saridan, 1999), it is known that the careful<br />

study <strong>of</strong> plant names reveals a wealth <strong>of</strong> knowledge on how indigenous people<br />

perceive and utilise their plant resources (Berlin 1973; Berlin et al., 1973; Berlin,<br />

1977; Brown, 1977; Hays, 1983; Balée, 1989; Berlin, 1992). It is also proven that<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> nomenclature can provide deep insights into the ethnobotanical taxonomic<br />

structure utilised by indigenous societies (Berlin 1973; Berlin et al., 1973; Berlin,<br />

1977; Balée, 1989; Berlin, 1992).<br />

This cognitive approach to the study <strong>of</strong> ethnobotany has been widely applied and,<br />

despite considerable regional, ethnic and social differences in the communities<br />

studied, many researchers have identified similar systems <strong>of</strong> folk classification found<br />

in place across the world (Ekandem, 1955; Berlin 1973; Berlin et al., 1973; Friedberg,<br />

1974; Berlin, 1977; Brown, 1977; Hays, 1983; Balée, 1989; Berlin, 1992). The<br />

recurrent features <strong>of</strong> these systems has led to the formulation <strong>of</strong> basic principles <strong>of</strong><br />

ethnobiological classification utilised by many folk societies (Berlin 1973; Berlin et<br />

al., 1973; Berlin, 1977; Berlin, 1992) principles that provide useful models for the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> how indigenous societies view their plant resources.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> folk classifications, it is claimed, are based on the universal<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> the morphological discontinuities among plants, and rarely, is<br />

classification based on functional considerations such as cultural utility (Berlin 1973;<br />

Berlin, 1992). However, utilitarian approaches to classification are also considered <strong>of</strong><br />

significant importance in the understanding <strong>of</strong> how indigenous peoples relate to<br />

219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!