05.01.2013 Views

R. Meyer J. Köhler A. Homburg Explosives

R. Meyer J. Köhler A. Homburg Explosives

R. Meyer J. Köhler A. Homburg Explosives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

297 Strength<br />

relevant parameter is its “strength”; here the criterion of the performance<br />

is not so much a high detonation rate as a high gas yield and a<br />

high heat of explosion. If, on the other hand, a strong disintegration<br />

effect in the nearest vicinity of the detonation is required, the most<br />

important parameters are the detonation rate and the density (W Brisance).<br />

A number of conventional tests and calculation methods exist for<br />

determining the comparative performance of different explosives. The<br />

determinations of the detonation rate and density require no conventions,<br />

since they are both specific physical parameter.<br />

Lead block test and ballistic mortar test<br />

Practical tests for comparative strength determination are the lead<br />

block test and the declination of a ballistic mortar. In both cases<br />

relatively small amounts of the explosive (of the order of 10 g) are<br />

initiated by a blasting cap. In the lead block test, the magnitude<br />

measured is the volume of the pear-shaped bulge made in the block<br />

borehole by the sample introduced into it; in the ballistic mortar test<br />

the magnitude which is measured is the deflection angle; this angle is<br />

taken as a measure of the recoil force of a heavy steel weight suspended<br />

as a pendulum bob, after the exploding cartridge has fired a<br />

steel projectile out of a hole made in the bob. The performance of the<br />

explosive being tested is reported as the percentage of that of W Blasting<br />

Gelatin, which is conventionally taken as 100% (For further details<br />

W Ballistic Mortar). In both cases the explosive is enclosed in a confined<br />

space, so that, for all practical purposes, the parameter measured<br />

is the work of decomposition of an explosive in a borehole. The<br />

disadvantage of both methods is that the quantity of the sample used<br />

in the test (exactly or approximately 10 g) is quite small, and for this<br />

reason accurate comparative data can be obtained only with more<br />

sensitive explosives; less sensitive materials require a longer detonation<br />

development distance (W Detonation), within which a considerable<br />

proportion of the 10-g sample does not fully react. Practical methods<br />

for determining the performance of explosives requiring much larger<br />

samples (up to 500 g) include the following.<br />

Jumping mortar test<br />

Two halves with finely ground surfaces fitting exactly onto one another<br />

form a mortar with a borehole. One of the halves is embedded in the<br />

ground at a 45° angle, while the other half is projected like a shot,<br />

when the explosive charge is detonated in the hole; the distance to<br />

which it has been thrown is then determined. A disadvantage of the<br />

method is that when high-brisance explosives are tested, the surfaces<br />

must be reground after each shot. The method gives excellent results<br />

with weaker W Permitted <strong>Explosives</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!