Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites: Metal and Ceramic ...
Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites: Metal and Ceramic ...
Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites: Metal and Ceramic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.3 Preparation of <strong>Ceramic</strong>-CNT Nanocompositesj137<br />
improvement in bending strength <strong>and</strong> toughness of nanocomposite over a monolithic<br />
SiC specimen fabricated under similar processing conditions. A reasonable<br />
relative density of 95% has been achieved by hot pressing [41]. Peigney s group<br />
fabricated Fe-Al2O3/CNT nanocomposites by hot pressing composite powder mixtures<br />
at 1335–1535 C [42]. The relative density of Fe-Al2O3/CNT nanocomposites is<br />
lower that that of Fe-Al2O3 composites. <strong>Carbon</strong> nanotubes tend to inhibit the<br />
densification of nanocomposites, particularly for materials with higher filler loadings.<br />
Bundles of CNTs are found in hot-pressed nanocomposites. The fracture<br />
strength of Fe-Al2O3/CNT nanocomposites is only marginally higher than that of<br />
monolithic alumina, but lower than that of the Fe-Al2O3 composites. Further, the<br />
fracture toughness of Fe-Al2O3/CNT nanocomposites is lower than that of Al2O3.<br />
Spark plasma sintering (SPS) is recognized as an effective process for achieving<br />
higher densification of ceramics at a relatively lower temperature with short<br />
holding time. Accordingly, several researchers have used the SPS method to<br />
consolidate ceramic-CNT nanocomposites [43–45]. For instance, Balazsi et al. compared<br />
the effects of HIP <strong>and</strong> SPS treatments on the microstructural <strong>and</strong> mechanical<br />
properties of Si3N4/MWNTnanocomposites [43]. Large differences in the properties<br />
of composites prepared by these two sintering techniques have been found. Fully<br />
dense nanocomposites with improved mechanical properties can be achieved using<br />
the SPS method. In contrast, HIP-treated composites exhibit a partially dense<br />
structure with coarser grains.<br />
<strong>Ceramic</strong>-CNT interfacial behavior is another key factor in controlling the mechanical<br />
<strong>and</strong> physical properties of the nanocomposites. Poor compatibility <strong>and</strong> wettability<br />
between CNTs <strong>and</strong> ceramics result in weak interfacial strength. The interface cannot<br />
transfer the applied load effectively under low interfacial shear strength. Thus<br />
stronger bonds between CNTs <strong>and</strong> the ceramic matrix are needed for effective load<br />
transfer to occur. Interfacial bonding in ceramic-CNT nanocomposites is less well<br />
understood compared with that of polymer-CNTnanocomposites. Both covalent <strong>and</strong><br />
non-covalent bonding between the CNT <strong>and</strong> polymer can be established by forming<br />
surface functional groups on nanotubes by acid treatment, fluorination <strong>and</strong><br />
functionalization [46].<br />
One possible approach to improve the wettability between CNTs <strong>and</strong> inorganic<br />
ceramic host is to coat CNT surfaces with proper surfactants [47–50]. However,<br />
surfactants may introduce undesirable impurities that can affect the sintering<br />
process <strong>and</strong> resulting ceramic-CNT composite properties. It has been reported that<br />
molecular level mixing [51], aqueous colloid [52–55] <strong>and</strong> polymer-derived ceramics<br />
[56] processes can yield homogeneous dispersion of CNTs <strong>and</strong> strong interfacial<br />
strength in the ceramic-CNT nanocomposites. For example, Fan et al. reported that<br />
the fracture toughness of the alumina/SWNT nanocomposites is twice that of<br />
monolithic alumina. They attributed this to the strong interfacial CNT-alumina<br />
bonding obtained by heterocoagulation [54, 55].<br />
In general, strong interfacial bonding facilitates effective load transfer effect, but it<br />
prevents nanotube pull-out toughening from occurring. Weak interfacial bonding<br />
favors CNTs pull-out but fails to strengthen the ceramic matrix. Thus, a balance must<br />
be maintained between nanotube pull-out <strong>and</strong> strengthening mechanisms. It is well