Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites: Metal and Ceramic ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 7.23 Coefficient of friction vs sliding distance for amorphous alumina matrix, thin- and thick-walled Al2O3/MWNT nanocomposites, tested with the pin-on-disk method. Reproduced with permission from [30]. Copyright Ó (2008) Elsevier. lower friction at low loading. Figure 7.25 shows the frictional force vs normal force at the nanoscale. The coefficients of friction for porous alumina matrix, thin- and thickwalled nanocomposites are determined to be 0.147, 0.142 and 0.073, respectively. The thick-walled nanocomposite again exhibits the lowest coefficient of friction at the Figure 7.24 Coefficient of friction vs scratching distance for amorphous alumina matrix, thin- and thick-walled Al2O3/MWNT nanocomposites. Reproduced with permission from [30]. Copyright Ó (2008) Elsevier. 7.6 Wear Behaviorj211
212j 7 Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotube–Ceramic Nanocomposites Figure 7.25 Frictional force vs apllied normal load for amorphous alumina matrix, thin- and thick-walled Al2O3/MWNT nanocomposites, measured with atomic force microscopy. Reproduced with permission from [30]. Copyright Ó (2008) Elsevier. nanoscale. The difference in the wear behavior of thin- and thick-walled nanocomposites is considered to be associated with the unique contact condition at the frictional interface and the buckling behavior of nanotubes. For the thin-walled nanocomposite, the nanotubes buckle readily, thus the sliding ball tip of wear tester at macroscale can directly contact with the matrix. The multiasperity contacting mode results in a high coefficient of friction. On the other hand, the thick-walled nanotubes are stiffer and resist buckling, thus can mechanically support the matrix during the wear test, provided that the applied loads are not too high. References 1 Newman, J.C. (1984) A review of Chevron-notched fracture specimens, in Chevron-notched specimens: testing and stress analysis (ASTM STP 855) (eds J.H. Underwood, W.E. Freiman and F.I. Baratta), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadephia, PA, pp. 5–31. 2 Gogotsi, G.A. (2002) Fracture toughness studiesonceramics and ceramic particulate composites at different temperatures, in Fracture Resistance Testing of Monolithic and Composite Brittle Materials (ASTM STP 1409) (eds J.A. Salem, G.D. Quinn and M.G.Jenkins),AmericanSocietyforTesting and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.199–212. 3 ASTM C1421-99 (1999) Standard Test Method for the Determination of Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. 4 Gogotsi, G.A. (2003) Fracture toughness of ceramics and ceramic composites. Ceramics International, 29, 777–784. 5 Mukhopadhyay, A.K., Datta, S.K. and Chakraborty, D. (1999) Fracture toughness of structural ceramics. Ceramics International, 25, 447–454.
Page 2 and 3:
Sie Chin Tjong Carbon Nanotube Rein
Page 4 and 5:
Sie Chin Tjong Carbon Nanotube Rein
Page 6 and 7:
Contents Preface IX List of Abbrevi
Page 8 and 9:
5 Carbon Nanotube-Ceramic Nanocompo
Page 10:
Preface Carbon nanotubes are nanost
Page 13 and 14:
XII List of Abbreviations HIP hot i
Page 16 and 17:
1 Introduction 1.1 Background Compo
Page 18 and 19:
Figure 1.2 Transmission electron mi
Page 20 and 21:
1.3 Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes 1
Page 22 and 23:
MWNTs can be as high as 70% of the
Page 24 and 25:
Figure 1.7 In situ TEM images recor
Page 26 and 27:
1.3 Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubesj1
Page 28 and 29:
show TEM images of MWNTs synthesize
Page 30 and 31:
Since then, large efforts have been
Page 32 and 33:
1.3.4 Patent Processes Carbon nanot
Page 34 and 35:
1.4 Purification of Carbon Nanotube
Page 36 and 37:
Table 1.3 Patent processes for the
Page 38 and 39:
Figure 1.13 Schematic illustration
Page 40 and 41:
1.5 Mechanical Properties of Carbon
Page 42 and 43:
Figure 1.14 Carbon nanotubes in hig
Page 44 and 45:
Figure 1.15 In situ tensile deforma
Page 46 and 47:
Table 1.7 Theoretical and experimen
Page 48 and 49:
Nomenclature ~a 1 , ~a 2 Unit vecto
Page 50 and 51:
carbon nanotubes. Physical Review L
Page 52 and 53:
70 Jang, I., Uh, H.S., Cho, H.J., L
Page 54 and 55:
108 Shelimov, K.B., Esenaliev, R.O.
Page 56 and 57:
Bonnamy, S., Beguin, F., Burnham, N
Page 58 and 59:
2 Carbon Nanotube-Metal Nanocomposi
Page 60 and 61:
isostatic pressing. In certain case
Page 62 and 63:
This implies the absence of effecti
Page 64 and 65:
coating material, the plasma gun an
Page 66 and 67:
Table 2.4 Changes in the size and v
Page 68 and 69:
Figure 2.6 (a) Low and (b) high mag
Page 70 and 71:
Figure 2.8 SEM micrographs showing
Page 72 and 73:
Figure 2.11 Bright field TEM microg
Page 74 and 75:
Figure 2.13 TEM image of bulk Al/5
Page 76 and 77:
2.5 Magnesium-Based Nanocomposites
Page 78 and 79:
limited improvement in ultimate ten
Page 80 and 81:
Figure 2.18 SEM micrographs of the
Page 82 and 83:
Figure 2.19 (a) Low and (b) high ma
Page 84 and 85:
Figure 2.22 SEM micrographs of (a)
Page 86 and 87:
Figure 2.25 (a) TEM micrograph show
Page 88 and 89:
2.8 Transition Metal-Based Nanocomp
Page 90 and 91:
Figure 2.27 TEM image of electrodep
Page 92 and 93:
Figure 2.29 SEM micrographs of (a)
Page 94 and 95:
Figure 2.31 Schematic representatio
Page 96 and 97:
einforcement content SiCp/Al compos
Page 98 and 99:
Materials Science Forum, 534-536 (P
Page 100 and 101:
composite. Materials Science and En
Page 102:
111 Cha, S.I., Kim, K.T., Arshad, S
Page 105 and 106:
90j 3 Physical Properties of Carbon
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
100j 3 Physical Properties of Carbo
Page 117 and 118:
102j 3 Physical Properties of Carbo
Page 119 and 120:
104j 4 Mechanical Characteristics o
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
132j 5 Carbon Nanotube-Ceramic Nano
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176: 160j 5 Carbon Nanotube-Ceramic Nano
Page 185 and 186: 170j 6 Physical Properties of Carbo
Page 201 and 202: 186j 7 Mechanical Properties of Car
Page 225: 210j 7 Mechanical Properties of Car
Page 231 and 232: Table 8.1 Patent processes for maki
Page 233 and 234: 218j 8 Conclusions development of c
Page 235 and 236: 220j 8 Conclusions Figure 8.2 TEM m
Page 237 and 238: 222j 8 Conclusions increase in Vick
Page 239 and 240: 224j 8 Conclusions References 1 Cha
Page 241 and 242: 226j 8 Conclusions nano-matrix. Scr
Page 243: 228j Index l laser ablation 7 load
show all

Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites: Metal and Ceramic ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?