16.07.2013 Views

Krig, medier og individ - NotatWiki

Krig, medier og individ - NotatWiki

Krig, medier og individ - NotatWiki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resuméer<br />

The thesis’ third theorist is Jean Baudrillard. Whereas Paul Virilio was concerned with<br />

“the total war”, Baudrillard is focussing on the visualisation of war and the tendencies which<br />

his critical writings are devoted to. In The Gulf war did not take place Baudrillard deals with<br />

war as an event controlled by the media. He comprehends war as an event, which is defined<br />

as well as directed by a technol<strong>og</strong>ically superior power. Thus, the sign simulations are<br />

constructing a story about a war that is not one in the real sense of the word.<br />

The methodol<strong>og</strong>ical section is concerned with Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse<br />

analysis which is an extension as well as a development of Michel Foucault’s scientific<br />

approach to the world. We have used parts of Fairclough’s discourse theory but have also<br />

permitted ourselves to improve the method in a way that fits our purpose. While Fairclough’s<br />

critical discourse analysis is abstractly comparative due to the text’s link to discourse, we are<br />

following another route, basing our method on a comparative study of two “texts”. The result<br />

of the comparative analysis is thus an analytical product, which is considerably easier to<br />

contextualise with the “discursive practise.<br />

Therefore the analysis is divided into two parts in the subsequent section, which gets<br />

down to the linguistic level of DR’s supplementary broadcasts on the Gulf and Iraq War. The<br />

linguistic analysis reveals that there is no considerable difference in language use, despite the<br />

gap of ten yearslying between the broadcasts and the major developments in the media. Both<br />

newsreaders use markers such as “vi” and “jeg” that are marking two communicative<br />

situations similar to each other. These markers are mainly used when the editorial staff is not<br />

briefed by telegrams from outside.<br />

The greatest difference is noticed there, where technol<strong>og</strong>ical development has influenced<br />

the broadcasts. This can among other things be seen in the use of graphics. While during the<br />

Gulf War graphical bottom lines were used to introduce newsreaders and guests, the TV<br />

screen was filled with a considerably greater amount of signs under the War in Iraq, where<br />

the bottom lines, or news tickers, were used to communicate more news parallel to the<br />

newsreader’s oral presentation.<br />

Another obvious difference is the interior of the studio itself. During the Gulf War the<br />

broadcast’s participants are presented in a traditional news studio, where the newsreader<br />

sitting behind a half moon shaped desk is talking directly to his guests. During the War in<br />

Iraq the newsreader is not directly facing the viewers, but is positioned diagonally opposite

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!