Desire for Greener Land

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Technical support Training / awareness raising: Training provided for land user, field staff/agricultural advisor. Training was on-the-job, site visits / farmer to farmer, demonstration areas, public meetings, courses Advisory service: The extension system is very adequate to ensure continuation of activities. Research: Yes, great research. Topics covered include technology. Mostly on station and on-farm research. There are three experimental sites with evaluations to determine the best choice of conservation tillage systems and crop rotations. Different conservation tillage systems were evaluated and compared to conventional tillage. On these experimental sites, several indicators (chemical, physical and biological) were evaluated. External material support / subsidies Contribution per area (state/private sector): Yes. INDAP (INDAP, Institute of Agricultural Development) Labour: Voluntary.. Input: Equipment (machinery, tools, etc.), agricultural (seeds, fertilizers, etc.), construction material (stone, wood, etc.), infrastructure (roads, schools, etc): fully financed Credit: The funding for the implementation of new technologies are 50% from the state (programme of recovery of degraded soils of the Government of Chile for soil conservation practices) and 50% of the producers themselves (materials, labour, etc.) Support to local institutions: The Yumbel project has had permanent participation of INIA (project DESIRE) and INDAP. Monitoring and evaluation Monitored aspects Methods and indicators bio-physical Soil fertility (soil nutrient content N, P, K, S), erosion (soil loss, loss of nutrients), quality of soil (compaction, bulk density, structure, aggregate stability) measurements by project staff economic / production Crop production (yield, quality), gross margin, profitability observations by project staff Changes as result of monitoring and evaluation: There were no changes in the approach and in the technology. SLM Approach: Dissemination of soil conservation technologies in dryland areas, Chile DESIRE – WOCAT 2012 199
Impacts of the Approach Improved sustainable land management: Yes, greatly improved; Mitigation of water erosion effects and better yields. Adoption by other land users / projects: Yes, many; because of the great results obtained by few farmers, the approach is being adopted by others. Improved livelihoods / human well-being: Yes, greatly improved; farmers that perform conservation obtained better yields, less work on the sowing and more time to attend to other activities on the land. Improved situation of disadvantaged groups: This programme targets small farmers of the commune, who have no access to the technology or to State aid. The results are highly promising regarding the incorporation to the development of this sector. Poverty alleviation: The improvement in yields and profitability of crops, the diversification of the production and the mitigation of land degradation are the strategies that are being implemented to alleviate poverty. Training, advisory service and research: Training effectiveness Land users - poor SLM specialists - excellent Agricultural advisor / trainers - good School children / students – good Politicians / decision makers – excellent Advisory service effectiveness Land users - good Politicians / decision makers - good Technicians / conservation specialists – excellent Research contributing to the approach's effectiveness Greatly, The results obtained in the experimental sites (Cauquenes), as a result of the DESIRE Project, are being adopted by Policy Makers (SAG) to generate new policies and financing instruments to help the farmers. Land/water use rights: These do not apply because in the area there are no water rights as there is rainfed agriculture and the farmers are all owners of their land. Long-term impact of subsidies: Positive long-term impact - Greatly Main motivation of land users to implement: Increased production , Increased profit(ability), improve cost-benefit-ratio , Rules and regulations (fines) / enforcement , Prestige / social pressure , Payments / subsidies, Reduced workload, Affiliation to movement / project / group / networks, Environmental consciousness, moral, health, Well-being and livelihoods improvement, Aesthetic SLM: Sustainability of activities: It is uncertain whether the land users will be able to sustain the approach activities. Concluding statements Strengths and how to overcome Weaknesses and how to overcome Great interest of farmers to improve their incomes and conditions of life A strong commitment from the local authorities with the project High rural population in this commune, involvement of young farmers (under 40 years) Assistance programmes from the State oriented towards tackling soil degradation This project has been sustained over time and will remain at least for 3 to 4 years. Key reference(s): - Contact person(s): Ovalle Carlos, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. covalle@inia.cl Insufficient training on soil conservation for the farmers or for technical assistance companies training, field days, demonstrative sowings, explanatory publications, practical work with farmers and technicians. Delay in allocation of resources of the instruments of the state synchronizing the availability of resources with the needs of the farmers for the execution of the work (supply purchases, rental equipment, etc.) Lack of no-tillage machinery organization of associative farmers enterprises for the purchase of machinery and agricultural implements. 200 DESIRE – WOCAT Desire for Greener Land
Page 1 and 2:
Desire for Greener Land Options for
Page 3 and 4:
DESIRE - WOCAT Desire for Greener L
Page 5 and 6:
Co-published by University of Bern,
Page 7 and 8:
Cross-slope barriers Progressive be
Page 9 and 10:
The present DESIRE publication desc
Page 11 and 12:
Contributing authors and DESIRE con
Page 13 and 14:
Desire for Greener Land - Options f
Page 15 and 16:
XIV DESIRE - WOCAT Desire for Green
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1: Desertification vulnerabi
Page 19 and 20:
In DESIRE, WOCAT methods and tools
Page 21 and 22:
Part 1
Page 23 and 24:
8 DESIRE - WOCAT Desire for Greener
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 1: Methodological framework
Page 27 and 28:
to Russia and China (see Table 1).
Page 29 and 30:
DRI = 5.4 Very high desertification
Page 31 and 32:
Table 2 provides a more detailed de
Page 33 and 34:
decision. This leads to solutions b
Page 35 and 36:
Aims and objectives This penultimat
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 7: The DESIRE Project has fo
Page 39 and 40:
References: n EEA-European Environm
Page 41 and 42:
Area (x1000 Ha) Major land use type
Page 43 and 44:
Major land degradation types per st
Page 45 and 46:
Rate of degradation per study site
Page 47 and 48:
Production services were affected o
Page 49 and 50:
% of area under conservation measur
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 16: Effectiveness of conserv
Page 53 and 54:
Conservation impact on ecosystem se
Page 55 and 56:
Analysis of SLM technologies Introd
Page 57 and 58:
Table 2: WOCAT categories of SLM me
Page 59 and 60:
Origin of technology SLM technologi
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3: Sensitivity of and toleran
Page 63 and 64:
No. of case studies Land Ownership
Page 65 and 66:
No. of case studies Increased farm
Page 67 and 68:
No. of case studies Improved harves
Page 69 and 70:
No. of case studies Increased plant
Page 71 and 72:
No. of case studies No. of case stu
Page 73 and 74:
Analysis of SLM approaches Introduc
Page 75 and 76:
system is focused on control rather
Page 77 and 78:
References: n Alkemade, J. R. M., v
Page 79 and 80:
actually implemented in the field.
Page 81 and 82:
Concerning SLM, the most widely app
Page 83 and 84:
Part 2 DESIRE - WOCAT Desire for Gr
Page 85 and 86:
Desire for Greener Land Mexico Land
Page 87 and 88:
2.1 SLM case studies Case studies -
Page 89 and 90:
Case studies - titles and short des
Page 91 and 92:
76 DESIRE - WOCAT Desire for Greene
Page 93 and 94:
Classification Land use problems: T
Page 95 and 96:
Assessment Impacts of the Technolog
Page 97 and 98:
Class sification Land d use problem
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Class sification Land use problemss
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Classification Land use problems: I
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Classification Land use problems: D
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Classification Land use problems: I
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Classification Land use problems: L
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Classification Land use problems: s
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Class sification Land use problemss
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Classification Land use problems: R
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Classification Land use problems: S
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Classification Land use problems: W
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Classification Land use problems: O
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164: Assessment Impacts of the Technolog
Page 165 and 166: Class sification Land use problemss
Page 169 and 170: Classification Land use problems: I
Page 173 and 174: Classification Land use problems: L
Page 181 and 182: Classification Land use problems: D
Page 185 and 186: Classification Land use problems: l
Page 189 and 190: Classification Land use problems: T
Page 193 and 194: Classification Land use problems: S
Page 197 and 198: Classification Land use problems: O
Page 205 and 206: Classification Land use problems: T
Page 209 and 210: Classification Land use problems: O
Page 213: Problem, objectives and constraints
Page 217 and 218: Problem, objectives and constraints
Page 219 and 220: Impacts of the Approach Improved su
Page 223 and 224: Input: - Equipment (machinery, tool
Page 233 and 234: Problems, objectives, and constrain
Page 245 and 246: Desire for Greener Land Opopejo Qui
Page 247 and 248: 2.2 Mapping case studies This secti
Page 249 and 250: Land recommendation Land conservati
Page 251 and 252: Portugal - Maçao The Maçao area h
Page 253 and 254: Italy - Rendina The Rendina area ex
Page 255 and 256: Greece - Nestos This area has chemi
Page 257 and 258: Turkey - Eskişehir The Eskeheşir
Page 259 and 260: Tunisia - Koutine The Koutine area
Page 261 and 262: Russia - Novy Land use in the Novy
Page 263 and 264: Botswana - Boteti The main land use
Page 265 and 266:
Chile - Cauquenes The Cauquenes are
Page 267 and 268:
252 DESIRE - WOCAT Desire for Green
Page 269 and 270:
Status of land degradation, sustain
Page 271 and 272:
Examples of potential SLM technolog
Page 273 and 274:
IV Up-scaling SLM strategies Actual
Page 275 and 276:
Case study of the DESIRE methodolog
Page 277 and 278:
II Identifying, evaluating and sele
Page 279 and 280:
The results showed that the best op
Page 281 and 282:
IV Up-scaling SLM strategies Some r
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Explanation pages of case studies:
Page 287 and 288:
Cropland (or grazing land, mixed la
Page 289 and 290:
Explanation pages of case studies:
Page 291 and 292:
Here appears an organogram - if ava
Page 293 and 294:
Pictograms SLM technology Land use
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Logos of partners 282 DESIRE - WOCA
show all

Desire for Greener Land

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?