26.03.2013 Views

Desire for Greener Land

Desire for Greener Land

Desire for Greener Land

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

No. of case studies<br />

Soil fertility<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Cropping<br />

management<br />

Water<br />

management<br />

Cross-slope<br />

barriers<br />

Grazing land<br />

management<br />

SLM technology groups<br />

very low<br />

low<br />

medium<br />

high<br />

degradation problems requiring mitigation action in these<br />

areas. Cropping management and water management technologies<br />

are mainly applied on flat to gentle slopes, where<br />

other degradation problems are prevalent, such as fertility<br />

depletion, vegetation degradation or salinization.<br />

23 of the 30 technologies (77%) are practiced on soils with<br />

low or very low soil fertility. None of the case studies are<br />

applied on soils which initially had a very high fertility and<br />

only one technology is on a soil with high initial fertility.<br />

Compared to earlier assessments, including all climatic<br />

zones 4 , more focus is given to improve the management of<br />

low fertility soils in the drylands of this study. This reflects<br />

the reality of drylands, where soils are generally less fertile<br />

due to less weathering and the prevalence of unfavourable<br />

substrates. It has not been assessed how far degradation and<br />

nutrient mining have contributed to a reduced soil fertility.<br />

Topsoil organic matter is closely related to soil fertility and<br />

has an impact on physical, chemical and biological properties.<br />

Similar to soil fertility, the majority of cases have low<br />

topsoil organic matter. Naturally, topsoil organic matter is<br />

rather low in drylands due to the reduced biological activities<br />

under arid and semi-arid climatic conditions. Because<br />

most soils where SLM has been applied contain a low level of<br />

soil organic matter, they have potential to increase organic<br />

Forest<br />

management<br />

DESIRE - WOCAT 2012<br />

Figure 9: Level of soil fertility in relation to the SLM technology<br />

groups be<strong>for</strong>e intervention. (Note that <strong>for</strong> each technology<br />

only the major category was selected).<br />

Morocco, Gudrun Schwilch<br />

China, Erik van den Elsen<br />

Availability of surface water<br />

9<br />

Cropping<br />

management<br />

matter and nutrient holding capacity and simultaneously<br />

sequester carbon in the degraded soil. This is an important<br />

functionality of reduced tillage, crop rotation with legumes<br />

and agro<strong>for</strong>estry systems.<br />

Figure 23, which is presented later in this chapter, shows an<br />

interesting comparison of the initial soil organic matter and<br />

the impacts of the SLM technology.<br />

As expected, the availability of surface water (proximity of<br />

streams or lakes) is very poor in most cases (see Figure 10).<br />

More on the impacts of this issue can be found below.<br />

Sensitivity of, and tolerance to, climate change<br />

The technologies were documented <strong>for</strong> the current climatic<br />

situation of the study sites. If climate is changing, then the<br />

positive-functioning of a technology could be negatively<br />

affected. Equally, under certain situations the effect could<br />

be positive. If the species used are not drought tolerant,<br />

a reduction of seasonal rainfall may cause hedge rows to<br />

become ineffective. The WOCAT questionnaire there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

assesses the perceived tolerance and sensitivity of an applied<br />

technology during extreme conditions, be it seasons with<br />

exceptionally low or high rainfall, temperatures or heavy<br />

storm (wind or rain).<br />

4 WOCAT, 2007<br />

Analysis of assessed SLM technologies and approaches across DESIRE sites DESIRE – WOCAT 2012<br />

No. of case studies<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Water<br />

management<br />

Cross-slope<br />

barriers<br />

Grazing land<br />

management<br />

SLM technology groups<br />

Forest<br />

management<br />

poor / none<br />

medium<br />

good<br />

DESIRE - WOCAT 2012<br />

Figure 10: Availability of surface water in relation to the SLM<br />

technology groups. (Note that <strong>for</strong> each technology only the<br />

major category was selected).<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!