30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter Two Part Two – Methodology - Page 79<br />

A Group-Analytic Approach to Understanding Learning<br />

Pines (2000) provides an elegant articulation of the link between the psyche and the<br />

social that is at the heart of Foulkes’ theory, based on the difference between cohesion<br />

and coherence. Although cohesion is seen as a core concept in group functioning, Pines<br />

links this to the more ancient and Germanic root of the word group which is linked to<br />

‘crop’, the gizzard of a bird where an agglomeration of substances can be found. These<br />

have lost their individual and discrete nature and are clumped together to form instead a<br />

fibrous mass. Pines argues that one form of group can be seen in the image of individual<br />

elements partly digested and glued together to form a bolus. He suggests that it is<br />

possible to see Bion’s Basic Assumptions (described above, on Page 55) as instances of<br />

powerful group cohesion.<br />

Pines differentiates this cohesion from the form of group pictured by the use of the later<br />

Latin root of the word group, which is connected with the concept of ‘grouping’ as an<br />

active process. In this, objects are actively grouped together to display an organisational<br />

principle of coherence. In a group-analytic small group, meetings take place under<br />

conditions set down and maintained by the conductor as dynamic administrator. These<br />

conditions relate to issues of space, time, reliability, confidentiality, the privilege of<br />

verbal communication over action, and the understanding that people meet together in<br />

order to increase their understanding of themselves and thereby to gain mastery over<br />

their inner lives. These organisational principles are part of the group analyst’s own<br />

mentality, derived from his or her training and position in the training matrix of the<br />

group-analytic community. Pines argues that it is this basic structure which will be<br />

tested over and over again through the life of the group, and which gradually becomes<br />

internalised by the group members themselves, so that in the long run they themselves<br />

become the organisers of the group. Each member of the group comes to occupy the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!