30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Three – Research methods and their use - Page 97<br />

the methodology of the study, is my observations of (and reflections on) experiences<br />

salient to the study (collected since 2002). Effectively, I have regarded myself for the<br />

duration of the project and since as being on continuous fieldwork assignment, and my<br />

accumulated notes over this period as data.<br />

I believe the use of audio-tape recordings is relatively uncontroversial, and aside from<br />

the well known limitations of such data (such as their restriction to the auditory<br />

modality), unproblematic. I am aware that the same is not true for my other source of<br />

data, my observations of (and reflections on) experiences salient to the study. With this<br />

source of data, as is commonly the case in qualitative methodology, many of my<br />

observations and reflections are part of the next stage of the research, the transformation<br />

of the data, which is considered in the next section of this chapter. However, from my<br />

perspective as a group-analytic ethnographer, I am choosing to regard some of my<br />

observations and reflections as data in their own right. This stems from the idea<br />

explored in Chapter Two Parts One and Two, that in some forms of therapy and<br />

research, the subjectivity of the clinician/researcher (notably, the experience of the<br />

relationship with the patient(s)/research participant(s)) is a valid and at times crucial<br />

source of data about the patient(s)/research participant(s). I have given examples of<br />

using my observations and reflections in the data chapters, eg on Pages 147 -151, 153-<br />

158, 161 and 162, where I have recorded relatively ‘raw’ or unprocessed associations to<br />

the transcripts of sessions, based on a combination of my memory of the experience in<br />

which I participated and a post-hoc response to reading the transcript, and then offered<br />

some illumination of what I am making of this data. These illuminated aspects are then<br />

picked up, for example in the comments at the end of the transcript in Chapter Five, and<br />

in the more experience-distant reflection that follows in each respective chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!