30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter Seven – A Discussion – Page 214<br />

The part of the session after the extract and leading up to the<br />

break<br />

Following the extract, it is as if Frances and Tom present alternative perspectives, Tom<br />

valuing events outside the course and the group (the Agency’s Seminar Series, open to<br />

the local professional community), followed by Judi promoting a forthcoming talk by<br />

Bill as part of that series on the work of Bion, whilst Frances emphasises the importance<br />

of what is available here.<br />

Frances then turns to having lost what she got from Judi (i.e. not being able to recall an<br />

insight that she had previously acquired through her learning from Judi in this group),<br />

but then to being able to find what she needed for herself outside, 10 in other words,<br />

being able to make a new sense of what she encounters without explicit reference to any<br />

content of the course. 11 Judi mentions research, and Paula then brings in material from a<br />

patient, as if to emphasise the importance of clinical work as well as the impact of case<br />

studies. Judi responds to Paula’s difficulty with her patient in relation to her own (i.e.<br />

Paula’s) need to write a case study by offering an approach that she, Judi, has used,<br />

which is to write the case study prior to asking permission to use it for purposes such as<br />

a membership application to a professional body. These two contributions, Paula’s and<br />

Judi’s, seem to raise anxiety in the group. 12<br />

10 I will examine this further below. Prior to this, I am prepared to bet that the case in question involves<br />

the containment of negative transference or counter-transference. My confidence in being prepared to do<br />

this is because of my strong hunch that Frances, in both having got something almost certainly from the<br />

group yet seeming to find it elsewhere, may be reflecting dynamics of her clinical work such as her<br />

experience of her treatment by a patient in her relationship with this, the learning group. This is, I believe,<br />

an experience for the group of projective identification.<br />

11 With hindsight, this is also a clear symbolization of integration of learning.<br />

12 The sequence described in this paragraph is explored further as Example 7.1 on Page 212 in ‘Analysis’,<br />

below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!