30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter One – An introduction to the study - Page 9<br />

place in the discussion of case material illustrative of theoretical concepts, in the<br />

supervised clinical practice required by the course, in clinical seminars and in<br />

supervision), and personal learning (taking place in personal psychotherapy, and at<br />

other times when opportunities for this present themselves, as in the reflective group or<br />

in the course of the learning group under study).<br />

There is some cross-over between these components of learning. For example,<br />

theoretical teaching raises the issue of clinical application, which strays into clinical<br />

learning. Many of the blocks to clinical learning, that are, for example, identified in<br />

supervision or case discussion, are personal in origin, so at least personal lacunae or<br />

blind spots for future attention can be broadly identified during clinical learning. On<br />

occasions, personal therapy or even the reflective group experience can illuminate<br />

theoretical understanding or promote clinical skill in otherwise unexpected ways. The<br />

most profound experiences can have impacts in all three areas. The significance of this<br />

point is to emphasise the need to be aware of a range of dynamics and processes when<br />

considering the impact of a change.<br />

There is a set of attitudinal predispositions that characterise the position of the staff in<br />

relation to this work, and which can be seen as comprising another key component of<br />

the course. As senior members of agency staff, the tutors were experienced<br />

practitioners, and needed very little further authorisation in terms of what and how they<br />

taught. They were clear that the task was to elicit an integrated clinical and personal<br />

competence within each student, rather than to impart wisdom for the students to take<br />

in. Their view was that the students had quite enough reading material, and rather than<br />

yet more new ideas, the students needed to assimilate into their practice the concepts<br />

and capabilities that they had already encountered in their practice outside the course

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!