30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Twelve<br />

Implications for Theory, Practice, and Research<br />

Introduction<br />

In this final Chapter, the aim is to look beyond the study, at what it implies for the<br />

related domains of theory, practice and research.<br />

Implications for theory<br />

These include both implications for the theory underpinning the teaching and learning<br />

of clinical practice, as well as implications for the theorisation of groups.<br />

Concerning the theory of teaching and learning, the study introduces the notion of a<br />

group-analytically informed model of teaching and learning. This entails the twin<br />

strands of ‘individual’ and ‘group’ that have been followed through this study, and can<br />

be seen to be present in much if not all social interaction. It can be argued that this fact<br />

requires acknowledgement by a range of future research. Although the two strands of<br />

this focus raise epistemological challenges (for example, whether the two can be<br />

considered mutually exclusive or not), experience in group-analysis and conceptual<br />

developments such as Elias’s figurations (see page 104) facilitate the handling of<br />

challenges.<br />

Regarding the theorisation of groups, this is a field that is not well elaborated. This<br />

study is an example of the combination of disparate contributions (from Freud<br />

(1913/1958), Klein (1959), Bion (1961), Winnicott (1953, 1969), Lacan (1979), Foulkes<br />

(1975), Matte-Blanco (1988), Hopper (2003), Nitsun (1996) and Dalal (1998)). In the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!