30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix Two – The Methodology in Action - Page A2-12<br />

In a conversation with a close colleague at the end of this meeting one year before, he<br />

asked what I made of it, and my mind came up with, “one thing is inside the other”. I<br />

arrived at that associatively, putting into words what came to mind without any<br />

particular thought of censorship. 5 My colleague observed that that construction was<br />

present in three of the topics discussed at the meeting: (professional registration where<br />

the government intrudes; bi-culturalism where another group are apparently becoming<br />

part of ‘us’; and in the public health system where therapists, who are seen by their<br />

colleagues in private practice from outside as privileged actually feel overwhelmed<br />

amongst others in their host organisation, and also within the community of<br />

psychotherapists where they are a minority envied for their financial and job security.<br />

Whilst the content of these three topics may very well have led to my association, “one<br />

thing is inside the other”, at a more general level I had picked up this sense from the<br />

meeting without necessarily thinking consciously about it. I think my association<br />

reflects a stream of experience within the group, aspects of which may be felt by a range<br />

of individuals each in their own way, but with an experience similar to my own (that is,<br />

of being in some ways taken over by the experience). There would, I believe, be<br />

considerable response if I offered my association to the group. I might, for example say<br />

to the group, “The group, having tried to make authority vanish, has subsequently<br />

discovered that it inside the body of the meeting”. The use of body would be deliberate,<br />

exploiting the ambiguity (and hence the potential metonymy) of the word, hence<br />

addressing a range of levels of possible meaning.<br />

These levels of meaning include a relatively direct reading of the text, say, that there is<br />

authority in the meeting. This could be read either to mean that there are senior<br />

5 Incidentally, I could do this together with this particular colleague because they are also a member of a<br />

group of colleagues with whom we have spent over a decade in a range of settings and groups<br />

communicating in this manner.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!