30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Eleven – A Critical Reflection on the Study – Page 323<br />

I need to acknowledge that many may find this proposition unacceptable. Why did I not<br />

undertake corroboratory interviews with my fellow participants, given that this would<br />

have been practically possible? I remain in contact with six of the nine students and my<br />

colleague even now, and could probably locate the three students of whose whereabouts<br />

I am unsure. Put briefly, as acknowledged above, my restricted focus stems from my<br />

interest in Hollway and Jefferson’s notion of the defended subject (2000). The idea that<br />

people can only have a limited awareness of their motivations and impulses leads to a<br />

tempered view of the value of first hand accounts.<br />

Feedback from outsiders<br />

Other than in supervision (monthly for the six years duration of this project), during<br />

presentations to colleagues, and when seeking comments from readings of all or part of<br />

the thesis by colleagues, this was not sought formally. I think that the complexity that<br />

follows from the range of roles that I had in this project led me to keep a close and<br />

relatively personal focus. This followed my appreciation of Wolcott’s (1994) notion that<br />

anthropological doctoral study is inevitably an isolated activity because one is going to<br />

new places, and the task of originality involves some withdrawal from the world rather<br />

than contact with it.<br />

Again, I need to acknowledge that many may find this proposition as unacceptable as<br />

that in relation to respondent validation. In my mind, I imagine a response of writers<br />

such as Hammersley (2007). This is my version of how they might conceivably<br />

respond. I can see there might be expression of concern that, in a flourish of post-<br />

modern reflexivity, I have largely substituted my own voice for that of anyone (or<br />

indeed, everyone) else, and hence have potentially done violence to a pervasive<br />

commitment to the primacy of a multiply-voiced community. In my defence, I wanted<br />

consciously and purposefully to write an almost solely personal account, reflecting the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!