30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter Two Part One – Literature review - Page 44<br />

enable in the hands of trainee psychoanalytic psychotherapists. Their work is consonant<br />

with the approach in the semester under study, although more focussed, as is Ogden’s,<br />

on learning within ongoing professional development than learning as part of formal<br />

training<br />

Thorndeycroft and McCabe (2008) offer a description of a coherent model to develop<br />

much needed reflective practice in clinical services in mental health. This is useful in<br />

highlighting the importance of participant engagement, and the way in which (much as<br />

in the case of the semester under study) deeply distressing experience can be<br />

experienced and expressed in unconscious ways by staff members and psychotherapy<br />

students alike. Their work is valuable in recognising the need for explicit structure, as<br />

well as aspects of phenomena that will occur during these types of activity, but again, is<br />

more directed to the maintenance and development of ongoing practice.<br />

The practice tradition of discussion of clinical work, particularly that of general medical<br />

practitioners, based on the work of the psychoanalyst Michael Balint (1957) has many<br />

elements in common with the approach taken in the semester under study. Balint’s<br />

approach has continued to thrive, and latterly been extended to the work of other<br />

clinical disciplines, and by the addition of other theoretical concepts, particularly (as in<br />

this study) by the inclusion of aspects of the theories of Bion (1962a) (e.g. Rüth, 2009).<br />

As in the semester, in a Balint group the presenter makes their work available to the<br />

group, but then sits back from the ensuing discussion, in which group members are<br />

asked to speak from their own experience of the material under discussion. However,<br />

despite the similarities, the purpose of the seminar under study is training rather than<br />

support for clinical practice, and the deliberate obscuring of practical details in the<br />

seminar is not equivalent to the de-emphasis on practical details in the Balint approach.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!