30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Three – Research methods and their use - Page 93<br />

Stewart analyses the apparent inattention to method in ethnography, arguing that despite<br />

a series of waves of ethnographic theory, there is really only one watershed of method,<br />

the rise of ethnography based on participant observation. He bravely seeks to address<br />

the gap in texts on method in ethnography, and arguably succeeds well, as follows.<br />

Stewart emphasises participant observation, holism, context sensitivity, socio-cultural<br />

description and (possibly) theoretical connections as the five characteristics that lead to<br />

a determination that a study is ethnographic, but also notes the complexity of this<br />

situation. These elements are tabulated below in Table 3.1.<br />

Participant Observation<br />

Holism<br />

Context sensitivity<br />

Socio-cultural description<br />

(and possibly) Theoretical connections<br />

Table 3.1 - Stewart’s (1998)<br />

Characteristics of an Ethnographic Study

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!