30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix Two – The Methodology in Action - Page A2-6<br />

demonstration of the use of the model to articulate thinking on what these processes<br />

represent, and on how the group might seek to address difficulties within these<br />

processes.<br />

The group involved is a local branch of a national professional organisation. The group<br />

holds a monthly meeting to which all members are invited, and in addition, senior<br />

members of the group responsible for overseeing the professional development of their<br />

more junior colleagues meet five times a year. The meeting of the seniors used to follow<br />

some meetings of the wider group, but the scheduling was changed. Ostensibly, this was<br />

in order to avoid an excessively long meeting time for the senior members, so that the<br />

meeting of seniors is now held at a different place and time.<br />

This development led to some members experiencing a split between the two groups. 1<br />

Following concern at the separation, attempts were made to bridge what had become a<br />

divide, and it was agreed to hold two ‘joint’ meetings 2 a year. Arrangements for these<br />

meetings represent something of a compromise, in that one of them is held at the time of<br />

the meeting of the seniors, the other at the time of the regular branch meeting, but both<br />

take place in the venue used by the wider membership. At the same time, it seems very<br />

telling that the groups continue to behave as separate, and hence take it in turns to<br />

provide food for those attending rather like a home/away arrangement in team sports<br />

matches.<br />

1 I notice that I have slipped in my thinking and language here, because rather than there being two<br />

separate groups, the senior members are in fact a sub-group of the wider group of all members of the<br />

branch. However, the slip is indicative of a process of perception that took place within the membership,<br />

such that the two entities seemed to become two separate groups.<br />

2 I wanted to write ‘joint meetings’, but in a sense all meetings of the wider group are ‘joint meetings’, in<br />

that all members are welcome to attend. It can be hard to know what to call the meetings, but the most<br />

accurate (albeit inelegant) label seems to be ‘the meetings of the wider membership at which the senior<br />

members undertake particularly to be present’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!