02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 reframing latin america<br />

semiotic approach, advances an argument about the genesis of essentialist<br />

thinking and places <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong> at its inception. For that reason, we will<br />

outline the basics of that argument.<br />

The study in question is an academic article written by Jorge Cañizares<br />

Esguerra, a history professor at the State University of New York, Buffalo. 2<br />

He argues that the origin of racial essentialism can be traced to colonial<br />

Mexico and Peru in the 1500s and 1600s. The context for the emergence of<br />

essentialist thinking was the consolidation of a distinct demographic population<br />

within the maturing colonial society known as criollos, or creoles.<br />

These were people of Spanish descent born in the <strong>America</strong>s. They considered<br />

themselves pureblooded Europeans, meaning that no one in their families<br />

had intermixed with Indians, though they had been born and raised in the<br />

<strong>America</strong>s rather than continental Europe. They were contrasted with the<br />

peninsulares, Spaniards born and raised in Spain who came to the <strong>America</strong>s<br />

to administer the colonies but who often did not stay there and returned<br />

home to Europe.<br />

This takes on signifi cance in the context of Spain’s need to justify its<br />

exploitation of Indian populations primarily for labor purposes. At the time<br />

of the Spanish Conquest, people defi ned one another according to how they<br />

interpreted the Bible, astrology, and the natural environment. Eventually,<br />

these would be replaced by more scientifi c arguments based in Europe’s<br />

emergent modernity, but until then they served as the primary tools for defi<br />

ning humanity. The Bible was understood as providing God’s word on how<br />

people were constituted; thus, on the proper social order as well. In a society<br />

heavily reliant on religion, as Europe was in the late 1400s and early 1500s,<br />

the Bible was deemed the fi rst and foremost authority on questions pertaining<br />

to human identity. But the challenge for Spain’s and Portugal’s colonization<br />

of the <strong>America</strong>s was that the Bible did not mention the New World or<br />

its inhabitants. Hence, Spanish and Portuguese intellectuals turned to astrological<br />

and environmental interpretations. It was believed that people’s<br />

makeup was determined by the stars under which they were born or the<br />

natural environment in which they were raised. Excessive heat or humidity<br />

had specifi c effects on people, as did dryer, colder climates, and certain<br />

astrological patterns.<br />

At the outset of Spanish colonization, the peninsular/creole divide did<br />

not exist. Basically everyone was a peninsular, and classifying people in<br />

the colonial project was not that difficult; there were only Europeans and<br />

Indians. Even though the Bible did not mention Indians specifi cally, the astrological<br />

and natural environmental arguments allowed Spaniards to comfortably<br />

rest on a distinction between the two. Indians supposedly grew

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!