02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

identity construct #1: race 97<br />

in our social existence; its constructedness notwithstanding, we may not be<br />

able to change these social forms without far-ranging and currently barely<br />

imaginable changes in familiar structures, such as an end to racial inequality<br />

and race-based social segregation.<br />

A related misunderstanding of the import of social construction is that<br />

it is simply a form of labeling or categorizing: to be black is simply to be<br />

labeled or identifi ed according to the rules that govern the practice of racial<br />

categorization. But this is like saying that to be a judge is simply to be a<br />

person whom society labels “judge.” To be a judge is a good deal more;<br />

it involves being accorded authority to engage in certain behavior within<br />

certain institutional structures. Similarly, to be a racialized black person<br />

is not simply to be called “black.” For racialization imposes certain ways<br />

of viewing the person who is called or self-identifi ed as “black”—as having<br />

something fundamental and natural in common with other black people;<br />

as radically other than persons of different races; and as possessing certain<br />

humanly signifi cant characteristics inherent in her racial nature.<br />

If there are no races, it might seem natural to express this truth by saying<br />

that to be black is just to be called “black” by one’s society, or to call<br />

oneself “black.” But, consider the following incident: In 1977 two aspiring<br />

fi refi ghters who were brothers identifi ed themselves as “black” on a civil<br />

service exam. Under an affirmative action plan that admitted black aspirants<br />

with lower scores than whites to fi refi ghter vacancies, the Malone<br />

brothers joined the force. They served for ten years. Then the fi re commissioner<br />

noticed that they had been classifi ed as black. They were promptly<br />

fi red, but appealed, in a case that appeared before the Supreme Judicial<br />

Court of Massachusetts. All available evidence brought before the court led<br />

it to conclude that the Malones were white. Despite their claiming of the<br />

category “black,” they seemed quite clearly to be white. They were members<br />

of the racialized group “white,” despite claiming to be black, just as I<br />

am an <strong>America</strong>n even if I go to the United Kingdom, affect a British accent,<br />

and attempt to pass myself off as British.<br />

In the sense of a racialized group, the Malone brothers were white, not<br />

black; they were not merely identifi ed or categorized as white. Still, racialized<br />

groups are social constructs, just as nations are; they are not natural,<br />

biological entities.<br />

The social construction of race sometimes takes the form, “Biological<br />

races are not real, but social races are,” or “Race is socially but not biologically<br />

real.” If the social reality attributed to “race” involved decisively<br />

discarding the moral and conceptual trappings that attend popular understandings<br />

of it—as the idea of “racialized groups” is meant to do—I would

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!