02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

civilized folk marry the barbarians 221<br />

targets a broader audience. It calls upon all <strong>America</strong>ns (i.e., <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>ns)<br />

to come together in the cause of national (continental or Ibero-<br />

<strong>America</strong>n) development and to resist foreign aggression, especially the<br />

growing neocolonial power of the United States.<br />

“Our <strong>America</strong>” is framed by the same civilization/barbarism dichotomy<br />

that defi nes Sarmiento’s Facundo and Gallegos’s Doña Bárbara. But<br />

Martí distinguishes himself from these authors in a decisive way. Instead of<br />

vanquishing barbarism, as Sarmiento does, or reconciling it with civilization,<br />

like Gallegos, Martí proposes that it be the foundation of <strong>America</strong>’s<br />

future society. Martí actually moves away from civilization and barbarism<br />

and favors a language that emphasizes local origins versus foreign infl uence.<br />

As Martí put it, “The struggle is not between civilization and barbarity,<br />

but between false erudition and Nature.” 7 By “false erudition” Martí<br />

means ideas or programs originating in foreign lands that are directed by<br />

foreigners and/or their local lackeys. By “Nature” he refers to homegrown<br />

ideas and leaders that are organic to the <strong>America</strong>s and not imported. Martí<br />

purposefully capitalizes the word because he believes it is the foundation<br />

upon which <strong>America</strong> should be built.<br />

Despite its brevity, “Our <strong>America</strong>” roots its political agenda in historical<br />

context. Whereas authors had argued and others would continue to argue<br />

that <strong>America</strong> was trapped in its duality between mother <strong>America</strong> and<br />

father Europe, Martí rejects the notion that the two aspects of <strong>America</strong>n<br />

history (the indigenous and the colonial) are irreconcilable. Rather, out of<br />

their combined history emerges <strong>America</strong>’s distinctiveness. In this way,<br />

“Our <strong>America</strong>” offers a classic nationalistic program by seeking out that<br />

which is supposedly original to the land and emphasizing it as the spirit or<br />

soul upon which the new nation should be built. Of course, Martí advocates<br />

for a continental nation, a Pan-<strong>America</strong>, rather than numerous individual<br />

nations, but the concept remains the same. The uniqueness of a land and<br />

its history is to be emphasized and drawn upon. In Martí’s words, “Government<br />

must originate in the country. The spirit of government must be that<br />

of the country. . . . Good government is nothing more than the balance of a<br />

country’s natural elements.” 8<br />

Martí uses the dichotomy of mother <strong>America</strong> and father Europe to defi ne<br />

the new natural leaders of <strong>America</strong>. The “sons of Our <strong>America</strong>,” should not<br />

be “ashamed of the mother who reared them, because she wears an Indian<br />

apron,” nor should they disown their mother because she is sick and on her<br />

deathbed. Instead, the natural leader should “tend his mother and nurse her<br />

in her illness.” These “sons of Our <strong>America</strong>,” Martí writes, “will be saved<br />

by its Indians.” 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!