02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

post what?! (not) an abbreviated introduction 33<br />

exercise of trying to discover the true <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>. A text’s genre or intellectual<br />

tradition might be worth noting in that it can shed insight on the<br />

distinct discursive communities to which its authors belong, or to whom<br />

it is directed. But to argue, as modernists are wont to do, that one fi eld of<br />

production, such as literature or history, is better equipped to reveal truth,<br />

is an untenable proposition. Likewise, to argue that certain forms of socalled<br />

high culture (like poetry) possess greater capacity to reveal the truth<br />

than “low” culture (like pop fi ction or fi lm) also lacks credibility. Drawing<br />

on Barthes’ theory of the death of the author, every writer is subject to discourse<br />

and every text is part of a collective expression of discursive production.<br />

We are in pursuit of those discourses.<br />

Another Form of Imperialism? <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />

and <strong>Cultural</strong> Studies<br />

The exercise of interpreting modern <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong> from a cultural theory<br />

perspective does not lend itself to scholarly consensus. Modernists reject<br />

it out of hand, and even cultural theorists disagree as to how it should be<br />

conducted. For instance, within the broad community of <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>n<br />

scholars, a sort of division exists as to which theoretical traditions are best<br />

suited to interpreting <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>n identity. A group of these scholars,<br />

many of whom are either from <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong> or work there, suggests that<br />

the contributions to cultural studies from U.S. and European academic institutions<br />

might have limited applicability for <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>.<br />

The scholars in this group are far from homogeneous in their approaches,<br />

and they are not necessarily organized. Their work has been published<br />

throughout <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>, and little of it has been translated into English,<br />

so it remains relatively unknown to U.S. and European scholars—although<br />

anthologies published in 2001 and 2004 promise to give it wider exposure. 31<br />

What unites these scholars is a shared belief in the existence of a distinct<br />

Anglo/North <strong>America</strong>n variant of cultural studies, often referred to simply<br />

as U.S. cultural studies, and in the idea that this so-called school has failed<br />

to incorporate intellectual traditions from <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>.<br />

This claim might seem surprising, given that an important impetus behind<br />

the development of cultural studies in U.S. and European intellectual<br />

circles was the insistence that modernist scholarship was too limited in<br />

focus and needed to include more and differing perspectives. Nevertheless,<br />

Neil Larsen, one of these scholars, puts the issue in the form of a question:<br />

“Do the various critical theories often termed ‘postmodern’ enable us to<br />

make better sense of contemporary <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>n reality, or do they merely

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!