02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

260 reframing latin america<br />

Mikhail Kalatozov and Sergei Urusevsky. In 1958 they won the top prize at<br />

Cannes with The Cranes are Flying. Soy Cuba was coscripted by the Russian<br />

poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko and the Cuban novelist Enrique Piñeda Barnet.<br />

The fi lm is typically both praised as an aesthetic and cinematographic<br />

achievement and denounced as anti-<strong>America</strong>n propaganda. The task of the<br />

semiotician, however, is not to pass judgment on the fi lm but to examine<br />

the discourse that speaks through the text, which is often disparate from<br />

the intentions of the fi lmmakers. Soy Cuba is a particularly stark case<br />

of this latter phenomenon. Despite the fi lm’s anticapitalist stance in legitimizing<br />

socialism for Cuba and for the world, it was criticized by Castro as<br />

counterrevolutionary and censured in Cuba and the Soviet Union. It was<br />

rescued from cultural oblivion in the capitalist West—fi rst in 1992 by the<br />

Telluride Film Festival for a tribute to Kalatozov, and later in 1995 by Francis<br />

Ford Coppola and Martin Scorsese who, with Milestone Films, restored<br />

and re-released it with English subtitles (thereby, in a sense, entering it into<br />

the capitalist canon).<br />

All of this provides evidence that Soy Cuba inadvertently challenges<br />

its own pro-socialist pretensions. Our contention is that because the fi lm<br />

is deeply rooted in an appeal to Cuban essence, it runs the risk of opposing<br />

socialism’s ideology of universalism. Moreover, we argue that its unwitting<br />

engagement with patriarchal presuppositions is at odds with the revolution’s<br />

professed commitment to gender equity. Finally, the fi lm’s intention to portray<br />

the failure of religion in the characters’ lives inadvertently conveys<br />

the sense that prerevolutionary Cubans were devout Catholics who were<br />

subsequently denied the right to religious practice. This presents a dangerous<br />

assertion, since Cuba was officially declared an atheistic state after the<br />

revolution when religious practice purportedly became a nonissue for most<br />

Cubans, rather than being severely restricted by the new government.<br />

Filming of the movie began in 1962, just two weeks after the Cuban missile<br />

crisis and three years after Fidel Castro came to power. It comprises four<br />

principal stories that defi ne Batista’s Cuba through the hardships and injustices<br />

suffered by the Cuban people at the hands of their dictator and the U.S.<br />

capitalists who pull his strings for their own gain. Each story promotes the<br />

seeds of resistance that will eventually become a popular revolution toppling<br />

the dictatorial regime. A female narrator links the stories by reciting<br />

Yevtushenko’s poetry in a mournful but fi rm voice-over and repeating the<br />

title refrain, “Soy Cuba,” to signal the end of one defi ning episode and usher<br />

in the next. From the young Havana couple whose future together is ruined<br />

by poverty, repression, and imperialism to the sugar farmer who torches his<br />

own house and cane fi elds in rebellion against the United Fruit Company

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!