02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

identity construct #5: latin america 159<br />

of works which do not even mention the concept nevertheless embody it<br />

in their structure or view of the world or both. Is it merely a fashion which<br />

has turned into a tradition? Or simply the infl uence of Jorge Luis Borges<br />

(1899–1986), author of the celebrated Fictions (Ficciones, 1944), who almost<br />

patented these concepts in elaborating his own conception of what reading,<br />

writing, thinking, and culture are? Or that of Octavio Paz (1914–1998), who<br />

has applied the concept archetypally to the question of <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>’s historical<br />

identity in his infl uential Labyrinth of Solitude (1950)? 9<br />

As we have seen, the colonial origin of “<strong>Latin</strong>” <strong>America</strong> left its people<br />

with a traumatic self-conception whose inherent dualism inevitably<br />

heightened the “natural” human tendency to think and advance by means<br />

of contrasts, differences, and opposites. <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>’s history can thus be<br />

interpreted in retrospect as a fi eld of forking paths, to refashion Borges’s infl<br />

uential metaphor (“The Garden of Forking Paths” is one of his best-known<br />

stories), with the choice between “Europe” and “<strong>America</strong>” inaugurating<br />

and preordaining a whole series of later choices as the determinants of race,<br />

nation, class and gender construct, reconstruct and deconstruct individual<br />

and collective identities.<br />

Labyrinths and Mirrors<br />

A labyrinth may be natural or man-made, above or below ground—the<br />

Ulyssean or Thesean variants—designed as a puzzle, entertainment, trap<br />

or prison. It may be real or imaginary, metaphor, symbol, or myth. It may<br />

be essentially symmetrical, or spiral, or have no discernible structure: its<br />

outer boundaries may likewise be of any shape. It may have a central focus,<br />

or several, which may or may not be at its topographical heart, which may<br />

give meaning to the whole, or rather to the journey or journeys which it<br />

implies, offers or demands. Most often, perhaps, one associates it with an<br />

underground quest, in the darkness, through spiralling corridors, in which<br />

one may easily get lost, downwards towards some intimidating centre; nocturnal,<br />

the space of our worst dreams but also the arena of our greatest<br />

triumphs and discoveries, including—perhaps above all—our identity and<br />

the meaning of our life. But then we fi nd ourselves asking: is this an origin<br />

and purpose rediscovered or a name conquered for oneself? For Freud, and<br />

above all Jung, the labyrinth is, archetypally, uterine, symbolizing a simultaneous<br />

longing to return to the maternal origin and fear of regression to<br />

the preconscious world of chaos; or, more historically, the site of a journey<br />

from a dark, enveloping matriarchal consciousness into the light of knowledge<br />

and patriarchal civilization. Needless to say, the problem with this for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!