02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

saussure, signs, and semiotics 43<br />

or structures, that were universal to all human beings, regardless of the<br />

different cultures or eras in which they lived. As a structuralist, Saussure<br />

wanted to discover these universal and underlying principals.<br />

Saussure’s structuralism might seem to contradict his insistence on the<br />

arbitrary yet conventional nature of sign systems; indeed, this is why his<br />

ideas represent an important development in the transition to postmodernism.<br />

But he himself was not a postmodernist or cultural theorist. Much like<br />

Sigmund Freud, his contemporary, Saussure ruptured some aspects of modernist<br />

thinking while reinforcing others. In the 1960s, scholars who used his<br />

ideas to develop the fi rst stages of cultural theory rejected his structuralism<br />

but retained his ideas about the arbitrary yet conventional nature of creating<br />

meaning. For that reason, scholars like Jacques Derrida (1930–2004),<br />

who can be described as a poststructuralist linguist, became founding fi gures<br />

in cultural theory.<br />

Using the leg-crossing signifi er, we can compare a pre-Saussurian (essentialist<br />

or hermeneutic) and post-Saussurian (semiotic) approach to notions<br />

of femininity and masculinity. A hermeneutician would argue that ontological<br />

male and female essences exist, and the way a person crosses one’s<br />

legs refl ects an innate masculine or feminine state. In contrast, a semiotician<br />

would reject the idea of intrinsic traits and contend that the playing<br />

out of feminine and masculine roles does not arise from the awakening of<br />

women and men to their true essences but is a performance that is both<br />

learned from others and then practiced to ensure one’s place in the culturally<br />

constructed gender structure. Semioticians do not deny the existence of<br />

anatomical, hormonal, and physiological distinctions between individuals.<br />

They do point out, however, that these distinctions become imbued with<br />

relative values given the prevailing gender discourse. In this way, notions<br />

regarding what counts as feminine and what counts as masculine create<br />

women and men, rather than the other way around. So, if a boy crosses his<br />

legs “like a girl,” he becomes like a girl, according to convention. We are being<br />

a bit facetious in making that claim, of course, but anyone who has been<br />

through grade school knows that a boy who exhibits what are thought of as<br />

feminine qualities will come under suspicion of lacking innate masculinity.<br />

He will be readily derided with insults that pertain to that don’t-be-such-agirl<br />

logic.<br />

<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> in Seven Simple Graphs<br />

By depicting this comparison between essentialism/hermeneutics and semiotics<br />

as graphs, we can better see how Saussure’s ideas revolutionized

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!