02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

graph 2.2<br />

saussure, signs, and semiotics 45<br />

that two texts with exactly the same words, but written in distinct eras,<br />

take on differing meanings. Semiotically speaking, context assigns variable<br />

meanings to the same words and renders the author a context/construct<br />

within which the reader’s act of interpretation occurs.<br />

Semioticians argue that authors simply record the words (signifi ers) onto<br />

the page, and the meaning of those words (signifi eds) gets attached at the<br />

moment readers see them. Does this mean that the truth once held by the<br />

author now resides with the reader? No, that would be a simple reversal<br />

of the essentialist model. Semioticians recognize that the intent of readers<br />

(i.e., their interpretive framework) is subject to discourse just as the<br />

intent (creative process) of authors is. Everyone is at once author and reader.<br />

<strong>Cultural</strong> theorists do not abandon the fact that authors write with intent.<br />

Rather, they invite us to focus on the discursive context that gives rise to<br />

intent (see Graph 2.2).<br />

Instead of looking to the intentions of authors to fi nd the meaning of<br />

words in a text, semiotic readers look to the discourses that inform the<br />

writing, discourses which may or may not overlap with those informing<br />

their reading. They still read the text, of course, but they see its meaning residing<br />

in discourse rather than authorial purpose. Graph 2.2 represents the<br />

way in which multiple discourses act as an obstacle through which words<br />

must pass from the author to the text and back again. Discourse develops<br />

and changes based on the inputs of authors and readers. It is simultaneously<br />

dependent upon us and independent of us. (Remember our brief discussion<br />

of David Parker in the introduction and his Bakhtinian approach to language.)<br />

In this way, semioticians posit that meaning is contingent rather<br />

than stable and that meaning lies outside author, text, and reader. Graph 2.2<br />

also represents Barthes’ critique of the modern author. When authors write

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!