Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs
Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs
Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
identity construct #5: latin america 183<br />
living in <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>, Africa, or Asia. They experience the power and repression<br />
of a society dominated by a Western-centric (Occidentalist) framework<br />
that effectively excludes them from the centers of power (the interior).<br />
23. Sandra Harding, Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialism, Feminisms,<br />
and Epistemologies (Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1998).<br />
24. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, and L. Torres, eds., Third World Women and<br />
the Politics of Feminism (Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1991).<br />
25. Harding, Is Science Multicultural; Donna Haraway, ModestWitness@<br />
FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience (New York:<br />
Routledge, 1998).<br />
26. Moya.<br />
27. Ilya Prigogine, “Science, Civilization and Democracy: Values, Systems,<br />
Structures and Affinities,” Futures 18:4 (1986): 493–507.<br />
28. The Frankfurt school refers to the group of scholars associated with<br />
the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research in Germany, which opened in<br />
1924. Many of the earliest members of the school are also some of its most<br />
widely recognized fi gures, including Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno,<br />
Herbert Marcuse, Erich Fromm, and Walter Benjamin. In the post-WWII era,<br />
the Frankfurt school is most commonly associated with the work of Jürgen<br />
Habermas. In its initial stages, the work emerging from the school tended to<br />
be Marxist in orientation but often with highly sophisticated rereadings and<br />
reinterpretations of Marxist theory. In later years, Habermas addressed the<br />
issue of postmodernism, and although he often seemed to embrace many<br />
of its basic tenets, he remained solidly situated in a modernist framework,<br />
contending that modernity could indeed achieve its objective of bettering<br />
the human condition. Mignolo is critiquing the Frankfurt scholars for failing<br />
to take into account the central issue of colonialism in their intellectual<br />
endeavors. He says that they remained wedded to looking at Western<br />
civilization from within and that whatever criticisms they directed against<br />
Western civilization were based on its repression of internal minorities, like<br />
Jewish people.<br />
29. Dipesh Chakrabarty, “Provincializing Europe: Postcoloniality and<br />
the Critique of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian’ Pasts?” Representations 37<br />
(1992): 1–26.<br />
30. Mignolo is referring here to the title of his book, The Darker Side of<br />
the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality and Colonization (Ann Arbor: U of<br />
Michigan P, 1995).<br />
31. Leopoldo Zea, The Role of the <strong>America</strong>s in History (1957; Westfi eld,<br />
NJ: Rowman & Littlefi eld, 1992), 129.<br />
32. Philip Silver, Ruin and Restitution: Reinterpreting Romanticism in<br />
Spain (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt UP, 1997) 3–41.<br />
33. Mignolo uses imaginary to refer to Western civilization’s sense of itself.<br />
By “the imaginary of the modern/colonial world,” Mignolo means that<br />
colonialism has played a central role in providing Western society’s sense<br />
of its own identity. By “natural belief” and “universal history” he means<br />
that Western society has used modernist/scientifi c principles to promote<br />
its defi nitions of self and others (i.e., the developing countries). The West