02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92 reframing latin america<br />

that considers human bodies as signifi ers to be assigned signifi cation, and<br />

sensitive to the idea of essentialism, Cañizares Esguerra was able to read<br />

the writings of these creole intellectuals in a new way. Consequently, he<br />

illustrates <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>’s participation in the creation of modern Western<br />

racial essentialism.<br />

Social constructionists and semioticians certainly recognize the incredible<br />

durability of racialist arguments over the past fi ve hundred years. They<br />

take note of how racialist essentialism was globalized along with the spread<br />

of Western modernity. But they are also quick to point out that racialist<br />

ideas, being social constructions or discourses, are highly fl exible and adapt<br />

to local and regional needs; thus, they tend to focus much of their research<br />

efforts on fi nding these variations.<br />

Despite the steady onslaught of social constructionist arguments, racialist<br />

views have proven highly resilient; indeed, so has racism. But in the<br />

latter half of the twentieth century, owing to populist political movements<br />

and the realization of the horrors of the Holocaust, the legitimacy of racism,<br />

and even of racialism, has been in retreat. But human beings have still<br />

needed ways to explain the distinctions that typify the complex fabric of human<br />

coexistence. So as references to race have declined, alternative terms<br />

have risen instead. Arguably, ethnicity is now the most widely accepted and<br />

commonly used among these.<br />

Ethnicity is supposedly a more neutral term that lacks the historic legacy<br />

of race and refers to cultural identity or place of origin rather than immutable<br />

traits in the blood. Even for those people who have no awareness<br />

of the concept of essence, the term seemingly avoids essentializing people<br />

and instead defi nes them with respect to their cultural grouping. Thus, according<br />

to this approach, people of African descent in the <strong>America</strong>s are no<br />

longer defi ned as being part of the black race but as belonging to cultural<br />

groupings, such as of African <strong>America</strong>n, or African Caribbean, or African<br />

Brazilian, depending on where they lived and what cultural group nurtured<br />

their identity.<br />

Ethnicity is the subject of the excerpt by Peter Wade, a professor of social<br />

anthropology at the University of Manchester, who has devoted much of his<br />

professional life to the study of race and ethnicity in <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>. Wade’s<br />

main argument is that ethnicity suffers from many of the same essentialist<br />

foundations as does the term race. Wade demonstrates how essentialism, as a<br />

sort of foundational modernist discourse, has affected the issue of ethnicity.<br />

Wade’s discussion is particularly important in the context of <strong>Latin</strong> <strong>America</strong>,<br />

especially to the issue of mestizaje, which we will defi ne at greater<br />

length in our discussion of nation. But briefl y, mestizaje originally referred<br />

to the racial mixing of Indians and Europeans that began with the Spanish

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!